NEW TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF THE MODERN IMAGE OF A MULTISTOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to a thematic study of new directions in the design of multistorey residential complexes. The factors affecting the conceptual and design decisions of architects are analyzed. The article provides examples of the most famous multistorey residential complexes built recently in different countries. The most famous building is the residential complex. «Interlacing» in Singapore. The project uses the principle of intersection of individual and public spaces in both horizontal and vertical directions. The author of the project abandoned the traditional vertical development scheme for Singapore, resulting in a unique example of a modern urban approach to housing design and organization of the natural environment. The second considered example of high-rise housing is the «Beirut Terraces» complex. The building is designed as a high-rise «shelf» at different levels of which there are apartments of different terraces that form the main artistic accent of the entire building. The building fits well into the surrounding dense urban development, while demonstrating the achievements of modern building technologies. The third example is the «Vancouver House», a multistorey residential complex with public premises on the first floors. structure, which fits into the so-called “parametrism” style, which has become especially relevant recently. The solution of the main building of the complex is interesting, especially its “anti-gravity” silhouette image. To create it, an internal cable-stayed system with vertically stretched metal cables was used. Multistorey residential buildings successfully solve the problem of compaction of residential development and increase the efficiency of the use of free territories, create economic prerequisites for organizing public spaces in the immediate vicinity of housing, which significantly increases the comfort and prestige of living in these complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".