MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378610593 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0431

0431 Different physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea symptom subtypes across international sleep centers

2023· article· en· W4378610593 on OpenAlexaff
Brendan T Keenan, Philip de Chazal, Thomas Penzel, Bethany Gerardy, Ulysses J. Magalang, Magdy Younes, Diego R. Mazzotti, Allan I Pack

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaNon-rapid eye movement sleepMedicinePolysomnographyArousalWakefulnessApneaSleep (system call)Internal medicineSleep apneaCardiologyOdds ratioElectroencephalographyAudiologyPsychologyPsychiatryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a widespread and heterogeneous sleep disorder. Studies have identified reproducible subtypes of OSA based on patient-reported symptoms that have different cardiovascular outcomes. Prior data showed similar apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) across subtypes; however, other physiological characteristics have not been comprehensively compared among these subtypes. Methods 1,285 participants from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC) with moderate-severe OSA (AHI≥15) were included. Differences in traditional and novel physiological traits were compared among the Disturbed Sleep (n=183 [14.2%]), Minimally Symptomatic (n=581 [45.2%]), and Excessively Sleepy (n=521 [40.5%]) subtypes using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for age, sex, BMI and race/ethnicity. Measures included AHI and other respiratory event indices, hypoxic burden, oxygen characteristics, sleep/wake amounts, electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral characteristics, including metrics related to the odds ratio product (ORP; a validated index of sleep depth ranging from 0.0 [deep sleep] to 2.5 [full wakefulness]), arousal intensity, and heart rate response to arousal. Results Compared to other subtypes, the Disturbed Sleep subtype demonstrated increased wakefulness (more wake time [p< 0.001] and wake after sleep onset [p=0.001]), higher beta frequency EEG power (14.33-20.0 Hz [p=0.025] and 20.33-35.0 Hz [p=0.004]), and less deep sleep (higher average [p=0.001] and NREM-specific [p=0.044] ORP, less time with ORP from 0.50-0.75 [p=0.004] and 0.75-1.00 [p=0.015], and more time from 2.20-2.25 [p=0.017] and 2.25-2.50 [p=0.0005]). The Excessively Sleepy subtype had more severe hypoxemia, including greater hypoxic burden (p=0.002) and lower average SpO2 (p=0.002) and minimum SpO2 (p=0.0002) compared to other subtypes. Conclusion Differences in physiological characteristics, including ORP-related traits, were observed among symptom subtypes. Results suggest that characteristics indicative of increased wakefulness may distinguish those with the Disturbed Sleep subtype, whereas more severe hypoxemia may characterize the Excessively Sleepy subtype. Future investigations into underlying molecular causes of symptom subtypes, particularly the Excessively Sleepy, are warranted given evidence of associations with outcomes such as cardiovascular disease. Support (if any) SAGIC Investigators (Ayas N, Chen NH, Cistulli P, de Chazal P, Gislason TG, Han F, Hirsch-Allen AJ, Keenan BT, Li QY, Magalang UJ, Maislin G, Mazzotti DR, McArdle N, Mindel J, Pack AI, Penzel T, Schwab RJ, Singh B, Sutherland K); NIH P01 HL094307

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207