MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611350 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0912

0912 Striatal atrophy and clinical correlates in REM sleep behavior disorder

2023· article· en· W4378611350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shi Tang, Bei Huang, Jing Wang, Li Zhou, Steven Wai Ho Chau, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Yaping Liu, Yun Kwok Wing

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth and Medical Research Fund
KeywordsREM sleep behavior disorderPutamenSynucleinopathiesPsychologyCardiologyInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseNeurologyAtrophyPolysomnographyNeuroscienceMedicinePathologyAudiologyDiseaseAlpha-synuclein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is regarded as the most specific prodromal stage of ⍺-synucleinopathies including Parkinson’s disease (PD). Striatal dopamine dysfunction is a pathological hallmark in PD, which has been similarly reported in iRBD as a sensitive marker for detecting early ⍺-synucleinopathies. In contrary, although there is a broad consensus that patients with PD have striatal volumes reduction, studies in iRBD are relatively scarce and inconsistent. In this study, we aim to investigate the difference of striatal nuclei volumes between iRBD and controls and their correlation with clinical presentations. Methods Altogether 105 patients (mean age=68.19, male 76.2%) with polysomnography-confirmed iRBD and 85 age and sex comparable controls (mean age=66.74, male 64.7%) underwent 3-tesla MRI and clinical assessments. FreeSurfer automatic segmentation pipelines measured the size of bilateral striatal nuclei including caudate, putamen, pallidum and accumbens area. The comparisons of the volume of individual striatal nucleus were made between iRBD and controls with age, sex, handness, and total intracranial volume as covariates. Correlations were performed to investigate the association between striatal nuclei volume and clinical domains in motor (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, Part III), cognitive (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), visual (pareidolia), autonomic function (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease - Autonomic Dysfunction, SCOPA-AUT) and mood symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Results There were smaller volumes in the bilateral putamen (t=-2.13/-2.32, p=0.03/0.02, left/right side respectively) and accumbens area (t=-2.58/-2.07, p=0.01/0.04, left/right side respectively) in iRBD comparing to controls. In addition, MoCA score was significantly positively correlated with the volumes of bilateral putamen (r=0.212/0.213, p=0.032/0.033), while pareidolia score was significantly negatively correlated with volumes of bilateral putamen (r=-0.205/-0.233, p=0.039/0.018,) and accumbens area (r=-0.249/-0.279, p=0.012/0.004, left/right respectively). The SCOPA-AUT score was significantly negatively correlated with volumes of the left putamen (r=-0.286, p=0.014) and the left accumbens area (r=-0.245, p=0.037). No other correlations with mood and motor features were found. Conclusion In this large case-control study, PD-like striatal atrophy was already present in patients with iRBD, which were significantly associated with worse cognitive performance, visual and autonomic dysfunction. Support (if any) This study was supported by Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund, 08191416.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207