0607 Improvement in Sleep Latency With FT218 (Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate): Analysis From the Phase 3 REST-ON Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction In the phase 3 REST-ON trial (NCT02720744), mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) was significantly improved vs placebo with investigational, extended-release once-nightly sodium oxybate (FT218 [ON-SXB]; P< 0.001). This post hoc analysis assessed response to treatment and improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Methods Participants (≥16 years) with narcolepsy type 1/2 were randomized 1:1 to double-blind ON-SXB or placebo. Doses were 4.5 g week 1, 6 g weeks 2‒3, 7.5 g weeks 4‒8, and 9 g weeks 9‒13. Mean sleep latency on the MWT was measured in 5 trials up to 30 minutes each at baseline and weeks 3, 8, and 13. Percentage of participants with improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20 minutes from baseline and with mean sleep latency=30 minutes were assessed. Two-sided P values were calculated using Fisher exact test. Results The modified intent-to-treat population included 190 participants (ON-SXB, n=97; placebo, n=93). At baseline, mean (SD) sleep latency was as follows: ON-SXB, 5.0 (3.1) minutes; placebo, 4.7 (2.6) minutes. More participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo had mean MWT=30 minutes at weeks 3 (6 g; 5.7% vs 0%; P< 0.05), 8 (7.5 g; 10.5% vs 1.3%; P< 0.05), and 13 (9 g; 13.2% vs 5.1%; P=0.14). A significantly greater percentage of participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo had improved mean sleep latency ≥5 to ≥20 minutes over baseline at all doses (6 g: ≥5 min, 57.5% vs 25.0%; ≥10 min, 35.6% vs 9.1%; ≥15 min, 18.4% vs 3.4%; ≥20 min, 10.3% vs 1.1% [all P< 0.01]; 7.5g: ≥5 min, 63.2% vs 28.2%; ≥10 min, 43.4% vs 11.5%; ≥15 min, 31.6% vs 3.8%; ≥20 min, 15.8% vs 1.3% [all P< 0.001]; 9 g: ≥5 min, 66.2% vs 37.2% [P< 0.001]; ≥10 min, 50.0% vs 19.2% [P< 0.001]; ≥15 min, 32.4% vs 10.3% [P< 0.01]; ≥20 min, 17.6% vs 6.4% [P< 0.05]). Conclusion Clinically significant improvements in EDS occurred with 6-, 7.5-, and 9-g doses of ON-SXB. At the 2 highest doses, >10% of participants remained awake for the entire MWT. If ON-SXB is granted FDA approval, adults with narcolepsy will have a once-nightly treatment to improve EDS. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".