MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611482 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0607

0607 Improvement in Sleep Latency With FT218 (Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate): Analysis From the Phase 3 REST-ON Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4378611482 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Thorpy, Colin M. Shapiro, Clete A. Kushida, Maurice M. Ohayon, Jordan Dubow, Jennifer Gudeman

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboNarcolepsyMedicinePost-hoc analysisAnesthesiaSleep onsetMultiple Sleep Latency TestPopulationWakefulnessPost hocExcessive daytime sleepinessInternal medicineSleep disorderModafinilInsomniaPsychiatryElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction In the phase 3 REST-ON trial (NCT02720744), mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) was significantly improved vs placebo with investigational, extended-release once-nightly sodium oxybate (FT218 [ON-SXB]; P< 0.001). This post hoc analysis assessed response to treatment and improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Methods Participants (≥16 years) with narcolepsy type 1/2 were randomized 1:1 to double-blind ON-SXB or placebo. Doses were 4.5 g week 1, 6 g weeks 2‒3, 7.5 g weeks 4‒8, and 9 g weeks 9‒13. Mean sleep latency on the MWT was measured in 5 trials up to 30 minutes each at baseline and weeks 3, 8, and 13. Percentage of participants with improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20 minutes from baseline and with mean sleep latency=30 minutes were assessed. Two-sided P values were calculated using Fisher exact test. Results The modified intent-to-treat population included 190 participants (ON-SXB, n=97; placebo, n=93). At baseline, mean (SD) sleep latency was as follows: ON-SXB, 5.0 (3.1) minutes; placebo, 4.7 (2.6) minutes. More participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo had mean MWT=30 minutes at weeks 3 (6 g; 5.7% vs 0%; P< 0.05), 8 (7.5 g; 10.5% vs 1.3%; P< 0.05), and 13 (9 g; 13.2% vs 5.1%; P=0.14). A significantly greater percentage of participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo had improved mean sleep latency ≥5 to ≥20 minutes over baseline at all doses (6 g: ≥5 min, 57.5% vs 25.0%; ≥10 min, 35.6% vs 9.1%; ≥15 min, 18.4% vs 3.4%; ≥20 min, 10.3% vs 1.1% [all P< 0.01]; 7.5g: ≥5 min, 63.2% vs 28.2%; ≥10 min, 43.4% vs 11.5%; ≥15 min, 31.6% vs 3.8%; ≥20 min, 15.8% vs 1.3% [all P< 0.001]; 9 g: ≥5 min, 66.2% vs 37.2% [P< 0.001]; ≥10 min, 50.0% vs 19.2% [P< 0.001]; ≥15 min, 32.4% vs 10.3% [P< 0.01]; ≥20 min, 17.6% vs 6.4% [P< 0.05]). Conclusion Clinically significant improvements in EDS occurred with 6-, 7.5-, and 9-g doses of ON-SXB. At the 2 highest doses, >10% of participants remained awake for the entire MWT. If ON-SXB is granted FDA approval, adults with narcolepsy will have a once-nightly treatment to improve EDS. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207