0579 Long-Term Safety of Once-Nightly Oxybate for Narcolepsy: RESTORE Study Interim Analysis of Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The pivotal phase 3 REST-ON trial (NCT02720744) evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB; FT218), an investigational extended-release formulation for treatment of adults with narcolepsy. In REST-ON, ON-SXB met its 3 coprimary endpoints: improvement in mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness test, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating (% much/very much improved), and number of weekly cataplexy attacks at all doses tested (P< 0.001 vs placebo). The safety profile of ON-SXB was consistent with that of immediate-release (IR) SXB. The ongoing RESTORE trial (NCT04451668) is an open-label/switch study evaluating the safety and tolerability of ON-SXB. Methods Participants aged ≥16 years with narcolepsy type 1 or 2 who completed the REST-ON trial, were on stable-dose (≥1 month) IR oxybate, or were oxybate-naive are eligible for RESTORE. Initial doses were 4.5 g/night or equivalent/closest to the previous total IR oxybate dose/night for those switching; incremental adjustments (1.5 g/week; maximum dose, 9 g/night) were allowed. Safety data for participants receiving ≥1 dose of ON-SXB as of 01 July 2022 are reported here. Results This analysis includes interim data from 180 participants (REST-ON participants, n=15 [8.3%]; oxybate-naive, n=35 [19.4%]; switch, n=130 [72.2%]). Most participants are white (n=150 [83.3%]) and female (n=122 [67.8%]); mean age is 35 years [range, 16–84]). Most participants who reported an adverse event (AE; n=105 [58.3%]) had AEs that were mild (61.9%) or moderate (32.3%) in severity. Three participants had serious AEs (abscess, deep vein thrombosis, rib fracture and pneumothorax); all were deemed unrelated to ON-SXB and all 3 participants continued in the study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs; ie, AEs related/possibly related to study drug) were reported by 76 (42.2%) participants with 6 (3.3%) participants discontinuing ON-SXB owing to ADRs. ADRs occurring in ≥3% of participants were nausea (11.7%), somnolence (6.7%), headache (5%), enuresis (5%), somnambulism (3.9%), dizziness (3.9%), tremor (3.9%), and vomiting (3.3%). Conclusion Interim data from the RESTORE study indicate that ON-SXB is generally well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation owing to ADRs. If granted final FDA approval, ON-SXB will offer adults with narcolepsy a once-at-bedtime oxybate treatment option. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".