MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611680 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0714

0714 Machine learning model for Predicting phenoconversion in patients with Rem behavior disorder using clinical markers

2023· article· en· W4378611680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yong Woo Shin, Seolah Lee, Han‐Joon Kim, Jun‐Sang Sunwoo, Ki‐Young Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRestless Legs Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcordanceMedicineBrier scoreDiseaseMissing dataPolysomnographyMachine learningInternal medicineComputer sciencePsychiatryElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder is a condition that can be an early sign of alpha-synuclein-mediated neurodegenerative diseases, and the course of the disease can vary greatly from patient to patient. It is important to identify patients who are at risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases in the future for the purpose of future clinical trials and for patients to plan their lives accordingly. Previous research has identified various risk factors for phenoconversion in RBD patients, but these studies are not practical for use in clinical settings due to resource availability or the rarity of certain features. Additionally, most of these studies have been conducted on non-Asian populations, which may have different genetic backgrounds than Asian populations. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict survival in RBD patients using clinical features commonly available in routine clinical settings. Methods This study recruited patients diagnosed with RBD based on polysomnography results and collected 34 features for each patient. Missing data were imputed and various models were applied to the data to improve performance. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using an integrated Brier score and the concordance index. Mean performance indicators were calculated from 5-fold cross-validation results. A web application hosting the final prediction model was developed and deployed on a server for use by physicians or patients. Results 173 patients were included in the study. We used the likelihood ratio test to calculate the p-values of all variables and selected the following 8 variables with p-values less than 0.1: UPDRS part III, age, history of antidepressant use, history of alcohol use, MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), PSQI-TST (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - total sleep time), AHI-REM (apnea-hypopnea index - REM sleep), and education level. The random survival forest model had the best mean IBS of 0.07 and the best C-index of 0.93 Conclusion We showed that it is possible for a machine learning model to predict phenoconversion in patients with RBD using features that are commonly available in routine clinical settings Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicRestless Legs Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207