MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378611695 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0157

0157 Physiological responses to acute psychosocial stress in adolescents with insomnia

2023· article· en· W4378611695 on OpenAlexaff
Dilara Yüksel, Boshra Khajehpiri, Mohamad Forouzanfar, Orsolya Kiss, Devin Prouty, Nicole Arra, Laila Volpe, Fiona C. Baker, Massimiliano de Zambotti

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthClinical Science Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsTrier social stress testBedtimeCortisol awakening responseMorningPsychologyInsomniaFight-or-flight responseMedicineAudiologyHydrocortisoneInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Insomnia often develops during adolescence, with girls being at greater risk than boys. Alterations in response to psychosocial stress have been linked to the etiology of the disorder, but it remains unclear whether the reactivity of the major stress systems (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and autonomic nervous system (ANS)) in response to stress is altered in adolescents with insomnia. Methods Forty-seven post-pubertal adolescents (age range: 16-20 years, 28 female) with (N=16; insomnia group) and without (N=31; control group) insomnia symptomatology underwent two randomized nights of polysomnographic (PSG) laboratory recordings. Participants underwent an experimental pre-bedtime stress anticipation protocol (stress night) and a control night during which they engaged in neutral activities before bedtime. The morning after the stress night, participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), a standardized protocol that requires participants to complete verbal and arithmetic tasks in front of observers. On both nights, heart rate (HR) was measured across the night and cortisol was collected upon awakening and 30 minutes later to calculate cortisol awakening responses (CAR). Stress perception, salivary cortisol (HPA activity), and HR were measured during the TSST. Results There were no differences in nocturnal HR recovery or in the CAR on the stress night compared with the control night in either group. Morning pre-TSST stress levels did not differ between groups. Both groups exhibited significant increases in HR in response to the TSST (p< 0.05). HR was higher in girls compared to boys in the control group at baseline (p< 0.05). Potential group differences in HPA responses to the TSST were inconclusive due to the apparent confounding effect of the CAR on cortisol responses to stress: many participants did not show a cortisol response to the task and larger CARs were associated with an attenuated cortisol response. Conclusion There were no significant differences in HR responses to anticipation of experimental stress during the night or in response to the morning TSST between adolescents with and without insomnia. Further work is needed to examine whether altered responses to stress may emerge if insomnia becomes chronic. Support (if any) This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant R01HL139652(MdZ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207