Very Large Cystoid Macular Lesions Identified Using Outlier Analysis of Genetically Confirmed Inherited Retinal Disease Cases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Cystoid macular lesions (CML) in inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) can contribute to vision impairment. Studying the morphologic range and outlier presentations of CML may inform clinical associations, mechanistic research, and trial design. Thus, we aim to describe the distribution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in IRD cases with CML and identify phenotype–genotype associations in very large cystoid macular lesions (VLCML).Materials and methods This cross-sectional study retrieved clinical information from electronic records from January 2020 to December 2021. VLCML cases were identified using the robust distance (Mahalanobis) of the correlation between central foveal thickness (CFT) and total macular volume (TMV) and a 99.9% probability ellipse. The distribution of OCT parameters was calculated by genotype and phenotype.Results We included 173 eyes of 103 subjects. The median age was 55.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 37.9, 63.7) and 47.6% (49/103) were females. Patients had disease-causing mutations in 30 genes. The most common genes included USH2A (n = 18), RP1 (n = 12), and ABCA4 (n = 11). Robust distance analysis showed that the prevalence of VLCML was 1.94% (n = 2 patients, 4 eyes). VLCML was seen in cases of NR2E3 (119-2A>C) and BEST1 (1120_1121insG) mutations. The median CFT in cases without VLCML was 269 µm (IQR 209, 318.50) while the median for VLCML cases was 1,490 µm (IQR 1,445.50, 1,548.00) (P < .001).Conclusions Subjects with different IRD genotypes may develop VLCMLs. Future studies could consider the range and outlier values of CML foveal thickness when determining inclusion criteria and biostatistical plans for observational and interventional studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it