Management for atrial arrhythmias in adults with complex congenital heart disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) is steadily increasing among adults. Atrial arrhythmias are frequent late complications and are associated with substantial morbidity. AREAS COVERED: We discuss key considerations regarding management strategies for atrial arrhythmias in common forms of CHD and offer future perspectives. EXPERT OPINION: An appreciation of the types of atrial arrhythmias encountered in patients with diverse forms of CHD, combined with the growing clinical and research experience, appears to be yielding favorable results, whereas little progress has been made on the antiarrhythmic drug front, indications for anticoagulation have considerably evolved. Advances in interventional techniques have propelled catheter ablation to the forefront to treat a variety of atrial arrhythmias in patients with complex CHD. Nevertheless, much work remains to be done to elucidate underlying pathophysiology, triggers, and critical substrates that predispose patients with specific CHD malformations to develop atrial arrhythmias. Future advances could allow for the implementation of individualized, possibly preemptive, approaches to arrhythmia management. With the prevalence of atrial fibrillation on the rise in the aging population with CHD, concerted efforts must be directed toward optimizing patient selection for catheter ablation as well as refining procedural aspects to safely and more effectively improve long-term outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".