MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex differences in isolated skeletal muscle force production: a spectrum of responses

2023· article· en· W4378648566 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole M. Fletcher, Kinley S. Gee, Coral L. Murrant

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkeletal muscleContraction (grammar)Internal medicineExtensor digitorum longus muscleEndocrinologyHamsterIn vivoMuscle contractionCremaster muscleAnatomyIsometric exerciseBiologyRetractorChemistryMicrocirculationMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whether sex differences in skeletal muscle microvascular responses differ in response to muscle contraction is currently unknown. To determine vascular responses to muscle contraction in vivo we use intravital microscopy using thin skeletal muscle models of mixed fibre types (i.e. hamster retractor muscle). However, to effectively quantify this relationship in vivo, the initial muscle contraction stimulus must be constant across the sexes and thus, we must first determine whether there are sex differences in skeletal muscle force generation. We hypothesized that sexual dimorphisms in force production would not be apparent in muscles of any fibre type composition. To test this hypothesis, we used skeletal muscles with unique fibre type characteristics and oxidative capacities. Mouse soleus (SOL: primarily type 1 >75%), extensor digitorum longus (EDL: primarily type IIB ~60%), and costal diaphragm (DIA: primarily type IIA ~55%) muscles were isolated from adult male and female CD-1 mice. The retractor muscle (RET: primarily type IIX ~58%) was also isolated from adult male and female Syrian hamsters. Muscles were electrically stimulated in vitro and force production was quantified at optimal length during a force-frequency test (1-120Hz) and twitch (1Hz) contractions. In mice, females generated greater force during the force-frequency test in SOL (10-120Hz) and EDL (30-120Hz) and generated greater twitch forces compared to males (SOL: female 34.7 ± 2.4 mN/mm 2 , n=21 vs male 27.8 ± 2.0 mN/mm 2 , n=17; EDL: female 41.2 ± 2.2 mN/mm 2 , n=35 vs male 32.5 ± 2.1 mN/mm 2 , n=29). Females generated greater force during the force frequency test in DIA at 30Hz only and no significant sex differences were observed in DIA twitch force (female 0.24 ± 0.02 g/mg, n=19 vs male 0.20 ± 0.02 g/mg, n=21). In hamster RET no significant sex differences in force were observed during the force frequency test or during the twitch contraction (female 0.13 ± 0.01 g/mg, n=19 vs male 0.14 ± 0.02 g/mg, n=20). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that sex differences in force production were observed in muscles primarily comprised of slow oxidative (type 1) and fast glycolytic (type IIB) fibres but not in muscles primarily comprised of intermediate fibres (type IIA and type IIX). These data show that on a spectrum of muscle fibres from slow oxidative to fast glycolytic, sex differences are most apparent on the extremes of the spectrum, whereas sexual dimorphisms in the middle of the spectrum are not apparent. This work is supported by NSERC. NSERC This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207