MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluating the effectiveness of an apelin analog as a potential treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension using a sugen-hypoxia rat model

2023· article· en· W4378648959 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennie Vu, Pavel Zhabyeyev, Kemar Brown, J.G. Seidman, Christine Seidman, Gavin Y. Oudit

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicApelin-related biomedical research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApelinHypoxia (environmental)Pulmonary hypertensionMedicinePlaceboVentricleInternal medicineCardiologyPulmonary arteryAdverse effectLungPharmacologyEndocrinologyPathologyReceptorChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a debilitating syndrome characterized by heightened pulmonary arterial pressures, and adverse pulmonary vascular remodeling. Eventually, the right ventricle (RV) decompensates, and fatal right heart failure ensues. Existing treatments for PAH are ineffective at improving survival. Apelin is an endogenous cardioprotective peptide, and disruption of apelin signaling was associated with the development of PAH. Restoring the activity of the apelin pathway is a promising approach in reversing the arteriopathy underlying PAH to protect the RV. The salutary actions of apelin are limited by its short half-life; recently, apelin analogs designed with extended half-lives offer a novel therapeutic avenue requiring further testing. Objective: Our project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an apelin analog as a potential treatment for PAH using a Sugen-Hypoxia (SuHx) rat model of PAH which recapitulates disease characteristics seen in humans. We hypothesize that the apelin analog treatment will improve pulmonary hemodynamics and preserve RV adaptation in rats exposed to SuHx and assuage the pulmonary arteriopathy seen in PAH rats. Experimental design: Male Sprague Dawley rats aged 9 weeks were randomly split into a placebo or treated PAH group. For 3 weeks, a control group was kept within normal room air while the placebo and treated PAH rats were kept in a hypoxia chamber (10% O 2 ). Placebo and treated rats were injected with SU5416 (20 mg/kg, SQ) once at the start of the 3 weeks to induce disease. The normoxic period lasted 5 weeks following the 3 weeks of hypoxia. Treated rats received apelin analog (0.5 μmol/kg, IV, b.i.d.) for the final 3 weeks of normoxia; the placebo group received the same dose of saline. Results: At endpoint, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements showed that placebo treated (PAH-P) PAH rats had reduced GFR while apelin treated (PAH-A) PAH rats had recovered GFR. Echocardiography revealed that PAH-A rats had improved cardiac function compared to PAH-P rats. RV Pressure-volume loop surgeries showed that PAH-A rats had ameliorated RV hemodynamic pressures in contrast to PAH-P rats. Histological analysis demonstrated reduced cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy, and fewer formations of pulmonary vascular lesions within PAH-A rats compared to PAH-P rats. Single nucleus RNA sequencing performed on RV and lung tissue delineated mitigation of disease progression within the PAH-A group compared to PAH-P rats. Electrocardiography recordings showed more severe electrical remodeling in the PAH-P group compared to the PAH-A rats. Conclusions & significance: Rats with PAH treated with apelin had overall improved cardiopulmonary health outcomes compared to placebo treated PAH rats. The results of this study provide insight into the beneficial role of the apelin pathway in the setting of PAH to propose a new treatment for patients with PAH to improve their duration and quality of life. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicApelin-related biomedical researchFrench-language works237,207