MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378652343 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0771

0771 An Innovative Intervention on Parental Sleep Beliefs and Practices: Its Effects on Children's Short-Term Sleep

2023· article· en· W4378652343 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Pétrin, Annie Bérubé, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri, Évelyne Touchette, Geneviève Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedtimeSleep (system call)PsychologyIntervention (counseling)Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexClinical psychologyCognitionDevelopmental psychologySleep qualityPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Inadequate parental sleep beliefs and practices have been associated with the development and maintenance of sleep difficulties in children. Disrupted sleep at a young age leads to adverse child outcomes and affects parents' sleep and family functioning. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of improved parental sleep beliefs and practices on child and parent sleep in the short term. Hence, we designed an innovative intervention for developing parenting skills in children's sleep management. Methods 15 caregiver-child dyads with preschool-age children were recruited through daycare centers and placed in small groups for a two-hour intervention and a follow-up. Children's and parents' sleep were respectively measured using the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Parental beliefs were assessed by three subscales (Setting Limits, Anger, Doubt) of the Maternal Cognitions about Infant Sleep Questionnaire (MCISQ). Parental practices were measured by two factors (Sleep Conflict, Sleep Dependence) of the Parent-Child Sleep Interactions Scale (PSIS). Data were collected before the intervention and two weeks later. Paired-sample t-tests were used to measure changes in each variable. Results Significant improvements were observed in scores on CSHQ subscales measuring Bedtime Resistance (t(14)=3.15, p=.004; M=11.3 vs M=9.47), Sleep Onset Delay (t(14)=3.21, p=.003; M=2.40 vs M=1.67), Parasomnias (t(14)=2.35, p=.017; M=10.9 vs M=9.87), and Daytime Sleepiness (t(14)=2.90, p=.006; M=13.0 vs M=11.3). Accordingly, total CSHQ scores were significantly lower (t(14)=4.70, p<.001; M= 55.7 vs M=49.5) reflecting less sleep disturbance in children. Parents' sleep was of superior quality, with global PSQI scores marginally decreased (t(14)=1.75, p=.051; M=6.93 vs M=6.20). Lower Sleep Conflict scores (t(14)=3.44, p=.002; M=7.67 vs M=4.8) and total PSIS scores (t(14)=3.59, p=.001; M=13.3 vs M=9.00) indicated better parental sleep practices. Conclusion These preliminary results show that parental interventions on children’s sleep management can improve child sleep and parental sleep practices. These results also highlight that parental practices about their child’s sleep can change independently of their beliefs. Long-term measures will help verify the course of changes in parents' sleep and beliefs regarding their child’s sleep. Support (if any) This project was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207