Bibliographic record
Abstract
The historic and cultural district of Nanjing Yihe Road has profound historical value, which should be preserved in today's society. To preserve these buildings means preserving the architectural history and culture of China. This paper examines the evolutionary process, the value and significance of the existence of the Nanjing Yihe Road Historical and Cultural Quarter, the existing problems, and proposes measures. The results show that there have been four stages in the evolutionary process from the implementation of the Capital Plan to the present. The value of the existence of the Yihe Road Cultural Quarter is divided into three aspects: cultural value, architectural value, and planning value. The construction of the Summer Palace has changed the traditional construction methods of the Chinese people for more than a thousand years and has pushed the construction of buildings in China onto the path of scientific design, which is also of great value in the history of modern Chinese architecture. However, some problems manifest in three aspects: poorly reflected values, poor preservation, and unsatisfactory improvement schemes. Several renovation proposals have been put forward in response to the problems, drawing on some excellent examples from China. Firstly, it is suggested to increase the functionality and spatiality of the building and pay attention to the development of Republican architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".