MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378674315 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-nc765

Aqueous-phase autoxidation in the atmosphere: fate and formation of organic peroxides

2023· preprint· en· W4378674315 on OpenAlexafffund
Tania Gautam, Erica Kim, L.‐K. Ng, Vikram Choudhary, Max Loebel Roson, Ran Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsAutoxidationChemistryAqueous solutionAqueous two-phase systemPhotochemistryEnvironmental chemistryNOxOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoxidation is a widely recognized mechanism known to initiate the degradation of food and lipids and modify organic matter in the atmosphere. Given the low NOx concentration in aqueous media (e.g., cloud water and fog droplets), autoxidation can become vital to facilitate the formation of highly oxygenated molecules such as organic peroxides (ROOH and ROOR). Here, we have identified aqueous-phase autoxidation-initiated hydroperoxides in varying organic precursors, including a laboratory model compound and monoterpene oxidation products. Our results show that autoxidation-initiated ROOHs are suppressed at enhanced precursor and oxidant concentrations. Furthermore, we observed an exponential increase in the yield of ROOHs when UV light with longer wavelengths was used in the experiment, comparing UVA, UVB, and UVC. Water-soluble organic compounds represent a significant fraction of ambient cloud water component (up to 500 µM. Thus, aqueous-phase autoxidation can become an important oxidation pathway for water-soluble species and as such facilitate the formation of ROOHs, thereby adding to the climate and health burden of atmospheric particulate matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207