MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Augmented sympathetic neurovascular transduction following acute exercise in normotensive adults

2023· article· en· W4378674462 on OpenAlexaffabout
Massimo Nardone, Kathryn Pfundt, Philip J. Millar

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroneurographyMedicineBlood pressureSupine positionCardiologyHeart rateInternal medicineNeurovascular bundleSympathetic nervous systemAnesthesiaBaroreflexSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The effects of an acute bout of aerobic exercise on sympathetic neurovascular interactions in normotensive adults remain unclear. Pharmacological work has previously demonstrated unchanged α-adrenergic receptor sensitivity, however, assessments under closed-loop conditions have not been conducted. The objective of the current study is to evaluate sympathetic neurovascular transduction following acute exercise in normotensive adults. We hypothesize that acute exercise will decrease sympathetic neurovascular transduction. Methods: Using a randomized cross-over design, eight young healthy participants (four female) performed either: 1) 60 minutes of cycling exercise at 60% VO 2max , or 2) 60 minutes of a seated control, separated by a minimum of 1-month. Ninety minutes following both interventions, a 10-minute neuro-cardiovascular assessment was preformed in the supine position. Beat-to-beat heart rate (electrocardiography), blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; fibular nerve microneurography), and superficial femoral artery blood flow (Duplex ultrasound) were quantified; femoral vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as blood flow/mean arterial pressure. Sympathetic-FVC transduction was quantified using the signal-averaging technique, whereby FVC responses to each MSNA burst were serially tracked over 15 cardiac cycles and averaged to derive the nadir change in FVC. Lastly, following measurements performed on the control visit, a subset of participants (n=4) submerged the lower limb into 40°C water to the level of the malleolus, to assess sympathetic-FVC transduction following acute increases in skin blood flow. Results: Compared to control, heart rate (60±8 vs. 66±8 beats/min), superficial femoral artery blood flow (68±25 vs. 104±42 mL/min), and femoral vascular conductance (0.9±0.3 vs. 1.4±0.5 mL/min/mmHg) were elevated following exercise (all P<0.02), while mean arterial pressure (76±4 vs. 78±7 mmHg; P=0.41) and MSNA burst frequency (18±6 vs. 18±5 bursts/min; P=0.85) were not different. The reduction in FVC following a sympathetic burst was increased following exercise (-0.12±0.04 vs. -0.17±0.06 mL/min/mmHg; P=0.04). A greater increase in FVC following exercise was associated with greater magnitude increase in sympathetic-FVC transduction (r=-0.65; P=0.08). However, the increase in FVC following lower limb heating (0.9±0.3 vs. 2.1 mL/min/mmHg; P<0.01) was not associated with parallel changes in sympathetic-FVC transduction (-0.07±0.04 vs. -0.07±0.04 mL/min/mmHg; P=0.92). Conclusion: Sympathetic-FVC transduction is acutely elevated following aerobic exercise, which was associated with the magnitude of post-exercise vasodilation. Considering that sympathetic-FVC transduction was unchanged during lower limb heating, these preliminary observations suggest that augmented sympathetic neurovascular transduction is facilitated by a blood flow-independent mechanism. This research was supported by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery Grant (P.J.M) and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fredrick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship (M.N). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207