MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of biological sex on the acute flow-mediated dilation response to maximal exercise in healthy older adults

2023· article· en· W4378674573 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Lapierre, Jin‐Su Kim, Alexander Beckers, Éléonor Riesco, Chatchamarn Soonhuae, Yasemin Sakarya, Eileen Handberg, Dana Leach, Demetra D. Christou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrachial arteryInternal medicineCardiologyPhysical therapyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a noninvasive measure of endothelial function and is a predictor of future cardiovascular disease risk. Previous studies have shown that biological sex modulates the FMD response to acute submaximal exercise in healthy older adults. However, the FMD response to maximal exercise has not been investigated in older adults; thus, whether sex impacts this response remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to investigate the FMD response to maximal exercise in older adults and 2) to test the hypothesis that FMD following maximal exercise will change differently in healthy older men compared with women. We studied twenty sedentary adults (50% women, age: 66±1 vs. 66±1 yrs, men vs. women, mean±SE, P>0.9), free of major clinical disease, who were not on hormone replacement therapy. Women were all postmenopausal. Vascular function was assessed before and after maximal exercise, based on a modified Balke treadmill test. FMD was assessed in response to 5 min forearm occlusion at 250 mmHg using brachial artery ultrasonography. We found pre-occlusion brachial diameter was larger in older men compared with women before (5.04±0.18 vs. 4.27±0.09 mm, P=0.002) and after maximal exercise (4.75±0.16 vs. 3.98±0.12 mm, P=0.001), but there was no sex × time interaction (P=0.1). Peak shear rate was significantly lower in older men compared with women before exercise (1852±81 vs. 2265±129 sec-1, P=0.01) and did not change after maximal exercise in either group (P=0.2). FMD was not significantly different in older men compared with women (P=0.1) before exercise and significantly increased following maximal exercise in both older men (3.84±0.66 vs. 6.55±1.27 %, pre- vs. post-exercise, P=0.009) and women (2.32±0.61 vs. 5.65±1.07 %, P=0.002), but the response was not impacted by sex (P=0.6 for sex × time interaction). When FMD was allometrically scaled to assess the potential effect of pre-occlusion diameter, our findings remained unchanged. Time to peak dilation was delayed in older men and women similarly following maximal exercise (51±2 vs. 75±7 and 56±7 vs. 85±7 sec, pre- vs. post-exercise, P≤0.02; P=0.7 for sex × time interaction). In conclusion, this investigation demonstrated for the first time in older adults that: 1) FMD is enhanced following maximal exercise and 2) biological sex does not influence the FMD response to maximal exercise This work was supported by National Institute of Aging grant AG063143-01. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207