MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effects of Muscle-Specific GSK3 Reduction on Murine Muscle Contractility and Metabolism in Female Mice

2023· article· en· W4378675428 on OpenAlexaffabout
Briana L. Hockey, Michael S. Finch, Rene Vandenboom, Brian D. Roy, Rebecca E. K. MacPherson, Val A. Fajardo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkeletal muscleInternal medicineEndocrinologyGSK3BBiologyGlycogenGlycogen synthaseCarbohydrate metabolismSoleus muscleExtensor digitorum longus muscleContractilityGSK-3HomeostasisMetabolismMuscle contractionGlucose uptakeKinaseMedicineInsulinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is a constitutively active serine/threonine protein kinase. Originally identified in skeletal muscle for its role in glucose homeostasis, GSK3 also negatively regulates muscle size and the transcription of genes associated with the oxidative phenotype. Previous studies have found that GSK3 inhibition improves whole-body metabolism and muscle quality in male mice. However, many physiological dissimilarities between male and female mice have been observed, specifically in terms of metabolic regulation; and it is currently unknown as to whether the effects of GSK3 inhibition observed in male mice are reproducible in female mice. Therefore, this study examined the effects of a muscle-specific GSK3 reduction on whole-body metabolism and muscle force production in female mice. We hypothesized that the muscle-specific reduction of GSK3 would improve glucose tolerance and muscle force production in female mice. Methods: A skeletal-muscle specific GSK3 partial (~50%) knockdown model (GSK3mKD) was generated on a C57BL/6J background. Experiments were conducted on female mice aged 2-4 months, with flox littermates (GSK3floxed) serving as controls (n = 6 per group). During the 7-week intervention, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were completed at baseline and week 7. On weeks 5 and 7, mice were housed in a Promethion metabolic cage system for 48hours. Glucose and insulin tolerance tests (GTT, ITT) were completed on week 6. At time of euthanasia, soleus (SOL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles were dissected and subjected to isolated skeletal muscle force frequency contractile experiments. Results: There was a main effect of body mass demonstrating that GSK3mKD mice were heavier than GSK3flox mice due to an increase in fat mass ( p = 0.02) and a trending increase in lean mass ( p = 0.08). There were no differences in cage activity, food intake, daily energy expenditure (DEE), respiratory exchange ratio, glucose- or insulin tolerance. There was a significant increase in force production in the EDL ( p = 0.005), which we attribute to a trending increase in cross-sectional area ( p = 0.08). In contrast, there were no differences in force production in the SOL. Conclusion: This study found that the muscle-specific partial knockdown of GSK3 increased body mass, but did not alter the metabolic phenotype (i.e., DEE or whole-body glucose regulation) in female mice, which is in contrast with GSK3 inhibition studies previously conducted in male mice. Furthermore, force production only increased in the EDL, which was primarily due to an increase in muscle size. In conclusion, there appears to be differences in the response to GSK3 inhibition in male and female mice, and future studies in our lab will examine the potential cellular mechanisms. CIHR Canada Research Chairs Program This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207