MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378716213 · doi:10.5334/jopd.80

Data from an International Multi-Centre Study of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties and Related Variables in University Students (the SMARVUS Dataset)

2023· article· en· W4378716213 on OpenAlexafffund
Jenny Terry, Robert M. Ross, Tamás Nagy, Mauricio Salgado, Patricia Garrido‐Vásquez, Jacob Owusu Sarfo, Susan Cooper, Anke Caroline Büttner, Tiago Jessé Souza de Lima, İbrahim Öztürk, Nazlı Akay, Flávia H. Santos, Christina Artemenko, Lee Copping, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Ilija Milovanović, Robert A. Cribbie, Marina Drushlyak, Katherine Swainston, Yiyun Shou, Juan David Leongómez, Nicola Palena, Fitri Ariyanti Abidin, María Fernanda Reyes, Yunfeng He, Juneman Abraham, Argiro Vatakis, Kristin Jankowsky, Stephanie Schmidt, Elise Grimm, Desirée González Martín, Philipp Schmid, Roberto A. Ferreira, Dmitri Rozgonjuk, Neslihan Özhan, Patrick A. O’Connor, András N. Zsidó, Gregor Štiglic, Darren Rhodes, Cristina Rodríguez, Ivan Ropovik, Violeta Enea, Ratri Nurwanti, Alejandro J. Estudillo, Nataly Beribisky, Karel Karsten Himawan, Linda Geven, Anne H. van Hoogmoed, Amélie Bret, Jodie E. Chapman, Udi Alter, Zoe M. Flack, Donncha Hanna, Mojtaba Soltanlou, Gabriel Baník, Matúš Adamkovič, Sanne H.G. van der Ven, Jochen A. Mosbacher, Hilal H. Şen, Joel Anderson, Michael Batashvili, Kristel De Groot, Matthew O. Parker, Mai Helmy, Mariia Ostroha, Katie Anne Gilligan-Lee, Felix Egara, Martin J. Barwood, Karuna S Thomas, Grace McMahon, Siobhán M. Griffin, Hans‐Christoph Nuerk, Alyssa Counsell, Oliver Lindemann, Dirk Van Rooy, Theresa Elise Wege, Joanna Lewis, Balázs Aczél, Conal Monaghan, Ali H. Al‐Hoorie, Julia F. Huber, Saadet Yapan, Mauricio E. Garrido Vásquez, Antonino Callea, Tolga Ergiyen, James M. Clay, Gaëtan Mertens, Feyza Topçu, Merve Gülçin Tutlu, Karin Täht, Kristel Mikkor, Letizia Caso, Alexander Karner, Maxine M. C. Storm, Gabriella Daróczy, Rizqy Amelia Zein, Andrea Greco, Erin Michelle Buchanan, Katharina Schmid, Thomas E. Hunt, Jonas De keersmaecker, Peter Branney, Jordan Randell, Oliver James Clark, Crystal N. Steltenpohl, Bhasker Malu, Burcu Tekeş, TamilSelvan Ramis, Stefan Agrigoroaei, Nicholas A. Badcock, Kareena McAloney‐Kocaman, Олена Семеніхіна, Erich W. Graf, Charlie Lea, Kalu T. U. Ogba, Fergus Guppy, Amy Warhurst, Shane Lindsay, Ahmed Al Khateeb, Frank Scharnowski, Leontien de Kwaadsteniet, Kathryn Francis, Mariah Lecompte, Lisa Webster, Kinga Morsanyi, Suzanna Forwood, Elizabeth Walters, Linda K. Tip, Jordan Wagge, Ho Yan Lai, Deborah Crossland, Kohinoor Monish Darda, Tessa R. Flack, Zoe Leviston, Matthew Brolly, Samuel P. Hills, Elizabeth Collins, Andrew Roberts, Wing‐Yee Cheung, Sophie Leonard, Bruno Verschuère, Samantha K. Stanley, Iro Xenidou‐Dervou, Omid Ghasemi, T. C. H. Liew, Daniel Ansari, Johnrev Guilaran, Samuel G. Penny, Julia Bahnmueller, Christopher J. Hand, Unita Werdi Rahajeng, Dar Peterburg, Zsófia K. Takács, Michael J. Platow, Andy P. Field

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Open Psychology Data · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityToronto Metropolitan UniversityYork University
FundersCHIST-ERAEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversity of Health and Allied SciencesKing Faisal UniversityAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloUniversitas PadjadjaranUniwersytet Śląski w KatowicachPécsi TudományegyetemNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapUniverza v MariboruUniversiteit van TilburgUniversity of the PhilippinesAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversitas Katolik Indonesia Atma JayaUniversitas IndonesiaMemorial University of NewfoundlandMacquarie UniversityAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity of HullAnglia Ruskin UniversityBaskent ÜniversitesiUniversity of CreteUniversitat Ramon LlullUniversity of StirlingErasmus Universiteit RotterdamUniversity of SurreyRadboud UniversiteitUniversity of BrightonEberhard Karls Universität TübingenUniversiteit van AmsterdamBournemouth UniversityBaily Thomas Charitable FundLoughborough UniversityUniversity of SussexUniversity College DublinUniversidad de La LagunaUniversity of SouthamptonNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversity of LimerickTrent UniversityEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiLibera Università Maria Ss. AssuntaGlasgow Caledonian UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityMEF ÜniversitesiUniversidad El BosqueUniversity of the Philippines VisayasUniversity of GhanaMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionUniversitas AirlanggaUniversitas Pelita HarapanUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WinchesterBinus UniversityLeeds Trinity UniversityKingston UniversityTeesside UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthNottingham Trent UniversityHungarian Scientific Research FundUniversity of DerbyAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și DezvoltareUniversity of Northern ColoradoJohn Templeton Foundation
KeywordsMathematics educationStatisticsMathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

= 12,570 students from 100 universities in 35 countries, collected in 21 languages. We measured anxieties (statistics, mathematics, test, trait, social interaction, performance, creativity, intolerance of uncertainty, and fear of negative evaluation), self-efficacy, persistence, and the cognitive reflection test, and collected demographics, previous mathematics grades, self-reported and official statistics grades, and statistics module details. Data reuse potential is broad, including testing links between anxieties and statistics/mathematics education factors, and examining instruments' psychometric properties across different languages and contexts. Data and metadata are stored on the Open Science Framework website [https://osf.io/mhg94/].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.480
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.080 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Open Psychology DataSame topicStatistics Education and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207