Jaringan pemilih Emil Dardak pada Pilkada Trenggalek tahun 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jaringan sosial merupakan salah satu dari tiga unsur modal sosial selain nilai dan kepercayaan (trust). Sebagaimana modal ekonomi, jaringan sosial sebagai bagian dari unsur modal sosial dapat dipertukarkan menjadi dukungan politik sebagaimana jaringan sosial Emil Dardak pada Pilkada Trenggalek tahun 2015. Emil Dardak sebagai bagian dari generasi muda memiliki jaringan sosial yang luas sebagai hasil dari interaksi sosial di masyarakat. Jaringan sosial tersebut terbentuk karena terbangun kepercayaan masyarakat kepada Emil Dardak. Kepercayaan masyarakat sendiri terbentuk dari hasil interaksi Emil yang mampu menunjukkan diri sebagai generasi yang memiliki integritas, memegang teguh tatanan nilai sebagaimana nilai yang dianut masyarakat Trenggalek. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor penting jaringan sosial dalam pemenangan Pilkada Trenggalek pada tahun 2015.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".