Bridging Structure, Magnetism, and Disorder in Iron-Intercalated Niobium Diselenide, Fe<sub><i>x</i></sub>NbSe<sub>2</sub>, below <i>x</i> = 0.25
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) intercalated with magnetic ions serve as a promising materials platform for developing next-generation, spin-based electronic technologies. In these materials, one can access a rich magnetic phase space depending on the choice of intercalant, host lattice, and relative stoichiometry. The distribution of these intercalant ions across given crystals, however, is less well defined─particularly away from ideal packing stoichiometries─and a convenient probe to assess potential longer-range ordering of intercalants is lacking. Here, we demonstrate that confocal Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool for mapping the onset of intercalant superlattice formation in Fe-intercalated NbSe 2 (Fe x NbSe 2 ) for 0.14 ≤ x < 0.25. We use single-crystal X-ray diffraction to confirm the presence of longer-range intercalant superstructure and employ polarization-, temperature-, and magnetic field-dependent Raman measurements to examine both the symmetry of emergent phonon modes in the intercalated material and potential magnetoelastic coupling. Magnetometry measurements further indicate a correlation between the onset of magnetic ordering and the relative degree of intercalant superlattice formation. These results show Raman spectroscopy to be an expedient, local probe for mapping intercalant ordering in this class of magnetic materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".