The Contextual Design Criteria of Infill Building Façade in Malaysian Urban Historic Districts: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The urban historic district is one of the man-made places with strong genius loci through its cultural heritage character and values.Architectural heritages are the core element constituting its urban fabric character.However, the emergence of infill buildings that intervene in the urban historic fabric with their conspicuous contrast faç ade architectural design threatens the genius loci of the urban historic districts.Therefore, this paper aims to systematically review the contextual architectural design criteria of infill building faç ade in urban historic districts.Using the content analysis method, this paper extracts the previous scholars' studies on heritage conservation guidelines, contextual infill building faç ade design approaches and the design criteria for the contextual infill building faç ade design in urban historic districts to answer the highlighted issues.In an urban historic district, the contemporary architectural intervention, especially the infill building faç ade design, must critically consider and respond to the existing urban fabric that has long been characterized by the place's genius loci to sustain its cultural heritage character and values.The infill building faç ade design must appropriately be articulated by balancing "compatibility" and "differentiation" elements in its architectural design as well as consider creating a "bond" and having family resemblance with the existing urban fabric of the historic district.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".