Material composition and microstructure of ceramic glass й hearth of blast furnace No. 6 of JSC EVRAZ NTMK after service. Refractory microstructure after service
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of a comprehensive study of the material microstructure of refractory samples after service in the furnace of a blast furnace with a useful volume of 2200 m3 for 14 years are presented. Structural and genetic analysis established a characteristic sequence of processes of degeneration and wear of the ceramic furnace stack, including 6 stages: the formation of micro-and macro-cracks; condensation of vaporous zinc; zinc oxidation with the formation of fire-resistant ZnO zincite and the deposition of carbon black by the; chemical interaction of zinkite with mullite and corundum to form ZnAl2O4 ganite and 2ZnO·SiO2 willemite; partial oxidation of silicon carbide with the release of silica glass SiO2, eutectic melt of complex composition, and wellimite. Due to intensive accumulation of capillary pores, infiltration of the slag melt in the volume of refractories does not occur. Wear of refractories in the furnace has a complex, mainly thermochemical mechanism and a low speed due to the formation of a garnish containing refractory compounds. Ill. 5. Ref. 14.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".