MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378838551 · doi:10.47599/bsdg.v18i1.378

DELINEASI POTENSI BENTONIT MENGGUNAKAN METODA GEOLISTRIK DI DESA SEKARWANGI, KECAMATAN CURUGBITUNG, KABUPATEN LEBAK, PROVINSI BANTEN

2023· article· id· W4378838551 on OpenAlexaff
Ade Ihsanudin, Mega Fatimah Rosana, Johanes Hutabarat

Bibliographic record

VenueBuletin Sumber Daya Geologi · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bentonite is an abundant mineral resource in Indonesia, based on data from the Center for Coal and Geothermal Mineral Resources (PSDMBP) in 2021 the measured resource of bentonite is 3,299,072,992.75 tons and has not been utilized optimally. Sekarwangi Village has bentonite resources, based on that the purpose of this research was conducted to find out the potential and types of bentonite found in the Sekarwangi area so that it can be put to good use. Sekarwangi Village is located in Curugbitung District, Lebak Regency, Banten Province, Indonesia. This research is divided into two stages, namely field activities and laboratory activities. Field activities include geological observations and geoelectric measurements. Laboratory activities are testing the geochemical content of rocks in the form of XRF (X-ray Fluorescence) and XRD (X-Ray Diffraction)analysis. The result shows that the rocks are composed of volcanic deposits, one of which is tuff. Based on the results of chemical analysis, bentonite in the study area is classified in the Ca-Bentonite category. Potential bentonite layer can be found at the depth of 1.27 - 40.24m. Bentonite has thickness ranging from 9.6m to 34.61m. The resistivity value ranges from 0.09 - 9.69 ohm/m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuletin Sumber Daya GeologiSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207