Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the two-dimensional motion of a charged particle in constant mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields. The magnetic field is assumed to be uniform, and the electric field components are assumed to be linear functions of the Cartesian coordinates. Under these assumptions, the equations of particle motion can be solved analytically. This solution is used to study the stability of particle motion and to assess the accuracy of the guiding center approximation in the presence of electric field gradients. It is well known that if the gradient of a one-dimensional electric field is sufficiently large, the motion of the charged particles becomes unstable and the particles are effectively energized by the electric field. This paper, however, demonstrates that the instability threshold depends on the spatial derivatives of both electric field components and is, under certain conditions, very sensitive to both. The analytical solution is averaged over the gyroperiod to derive simple expressions for the drift speed and the position of the gyrocenter, which explicitly account for the electric field gradient. The results of this averaging are used to develop equations for tracing the particle gyrocenter location, which incorporate the effects of non-uniformity of the electric field. These equations are shown to be noticeably more accurate than those based on the standard E × B drift velocity, which is exact only for uniform electric and magnetic fields. Simple expressions for the local errors in the E × B drift velocity are also derived, which arise from the electric field gradients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".