MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378965580 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560207

Application of Zhou’s Balanced Truncation Algorithm for Controlling the Balance of Bicyrobot

2023· article· fr· W4378965580 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hai Binh Nguyen, Vu Duy Hung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Truncation (statistics)AlgorithmMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article introduces a bicyrobot built on the principle of gyroscope.A robust optimal controller has been designed to maintain a stable balance of the bicyrobot.However, the disadvantage of the controller is the high order.Therefore, the paper has applied Zhou's balanced truncation algorithm to reduce the order of high order controller.The results of order reduction of the high order controller show that the 3 rd -order controller can replace the high order controller.The bicyrobot balance control system using a 3 rd -order controller has the same quality as the bicyrobot balance control system using a high order controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsFrench-language works237,207