Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas and Transboundary Waters: An Examination of Bilateral Management of the Salish Sea
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Salish Sea experiences substantial vessel traffic and is vulnerable to impacts from vessel-source pollution. In response to anticipated increases in vessel traffic and risk of oil spills, the non-profit organization Friends of the San Juans advocated for the United States and Canada to adopt a transboundary Particularly Sensitive Sea Area ( PSSA ) through the Interna-tional Maritime Organization. However, neither State ultimately supported a PSSA proposal. This article examines the unsuccessful PSSA proposal for the Salish Sea within the broader context of the PSSA mechanism to under-stand the limitations of PSSA s and provide insight into why and how PSSA designations have changed over time. Here, the Salish Sea case presents an opportunity to examine the factors that States weigh when deciding whether to propose a PSSA , and how these factors relate to potential limita-tions of the PSSA mechanism. States with a history of transnational cooper-ation, such as the United States and Canada, may be more averse to using a PSSA mechanism when more familiar and trusted systems for bilateral co-operation exist. In this way, States may rely on existing institutions, prece-dents, and agreements for transboundary collaboration between one an-other and with indigenous communities impacted by an environmental issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it