Multiple forms of bioimmuration in a coral–crinoid–bryozoan association from the Middle Devonian Onondaga Formation of southeastern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large favositid tabulate coral colony from the Middle Devonian Edgecliff Member of the Onondaga Formation, collected from Port Colborne, southernmost Ontario, is described herein because of several noteworthy paleontological features preserved via overgrowth by the coral. The initial substratum colonized and subsequently overgrown by the favositid was a large solitary rugose coral, and outward growth resulted in overgrowth of multiple macrofossils, including relatively long portions of large-diameter (probably camerate) crinoid columns. The crinoid columns, which likely represent portions of robust, recumbent dististelar attachment structures, are otherwise known almost entirely from isolated columnals at the collection locality and similar high-energy biostromal lithofacies in the Edgecliff Member elsewhere. One of the crinoid columns is encrusted by a stenolaemate bryozoan containing several examples of a parasitic bioclaustration structure similar to Catellocaula. Hence, the composite coral–crinoid–bryozoan association contains two forms of bioimmuration: preservation of the relatively intact crinoid columns via overgrowth and eventual incorporation into the base of the tabulate coral and preservation of the outline of the bioclaustrated organism (potentially an ascidian tunicate) via embedment in the bryozoan. This specimen serves as a testament to the diversity of biotic interactions and preservational mechanisms that occurred in Paleozoic carbonate build-ups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".