MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379011462 · doi:10.1080/03772063.2023.2217131

Non-unit Protection for Asymmetrical DC Line Faults in Bipolar LCC-HVDC Transmission Systems

2023· article· en· W4379011462 on OpenAlexaff
Ravi Shankar Tiwari, Om Hari Gupta, Vijay K. Sood, Salauddin Ansari

Bibliographic record

VenueIETE Journal of Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power transmissionTransmission lineEngineeringTransient (computer programming)MATLABTransformerElectromagnetic coilVoltageControl theory (sociology)High-voltage direct currentElectrical engineeringRobustness (evolution)Electronic engineeringInterruptDirect currentComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The faults in high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines cause a sudden rise in DC, resulting in over-stressing of converter valves and transformer windings. DC line faults of longer duration, or permanent nature, will lead to a severe disturbance in the associated AC network as well. Thus, the HVDC line faults must be detected immediately to interrupt the fault current by initiating proper actions of control and protection. This paper implements a new method to detect the asymmetrical (pole-to-ground) faults in the conventional bipolar LCC-HVDC transmission system. The proposed method defines a Fault Indicating Parameter (FIP) based on the transient voltage and current elements of each pole. The transient elements are obtained based on single-end measurements. Single-end or non-unit measurements lead to the development of simple, cost-effective and fast protection criteria. Also, the method is applicable to faults close to the line boundary and of high resistivity. A two-terminal bipolar LCC-HVDC transmission system, based on ±500 kV, 1000 MW and 900 km length, is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed technique in offline mode, using MATLAB/Simulink software. Also, the results are validated using an OPAL-RT real-time simulator under divergent fault conditions. The simulation results prove the robustness, selectiveness and accuracy of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIETE Journal of ResearchSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207