MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379014828 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346599

VERTICO

2023· article· en· W4379014828 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian Roberts, Toby Brown, Nikki Zabel, C. D. Wilson, Aeree Chung, Laura C. Parker, Dhruv Bisaria, A. Boselli, Barbara Catinella, Ryan Chown, L. Cortese, Timothy A. Davis, Sara L. Ellison, María J. Jiménez-Donaire, Bumhyun Lee, Rory Smith, Kristine Spekkens, Adam R. H. Stevens, Mallory Thorp, V. Villanueva, Adam B. Watts, Charlotte Welker, Hyein Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaUniversity of VictoriaWestern UniversityQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Research FoundationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloCanada Research ChairsNational Science FoundationKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Radio Astronomy Observatory
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyse cold-gas distributions in Virgo cluster galaxies using resolved observations of CO(2-1), which traces molecular hydrogen (H2), and H I from the Virgo Environment Traced In CO (VERTICO) and VLA Imaging of Virgo in Atomic Gas (VIVA) surveys. From a theoretical perspective, it is expected that environmental processes in clusters will have a stronger influence on diffuse atomic gas compared to the relatively dense molecular gas component, and that these environmental perturbations can compress the cold interstellar medium in cluster galaxies, leading to elevated star formation. In this work we observationally test these predictions for star-forming satellite galaxies within the Virgo cluster. We divided our Virgo galaxy sample into H I-normal, H I-tailed, and H I-truncated classes and show, unsurprisingly, that the H I-tailed galaxies have the largest quantitative H I asymmetries. We also compared Virgo galaxies to a control sample of non-cluster galaxies and find that the former, on average, have H I asymmetries that are 40 ± 10% larger than the latter. There is less separation between control, H I-normal, H I-tailed, and H I-truncated galaxies in terms of H2 asymmetries, and on average, Virgo galaxies have H2 asymmetries that are only marginally (20 ± 10%) larger than the control sample. We find a weak correlation between H I and H2 asymmetries over our entire sample, but a stronger correlation for the galaxies that are strongly impacted by environmental perturbations. Finally, we divided the discs of the H I-tailed Virgo galaxies into a leading half and trailing half according to the observed tail direction. We find evidence for excess molecular gas mass on the leading halves of the disc. This excess molecular gas is accompanied by an excess in the star formation rate such that the depletion time is, on average, unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2590.164

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207