Disaster Preparedness in Proximity of Merapi Volcano, Indonesia: Is There Any Relationship in Knowledge and Attitude of Senior High School Students?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cangkringan District, Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia categorized as a volcanic disaster-prone area.In the study area, every student possesses knowledge and attitude toward volcano disaster preparedness since they have a high risk when Merapi Volcano erupts.The objectives of this study were to 1) find out the disaster knowledge attitudes and student preparedness in dealing with volcanic disasters and (2) find out the relationship between knowledge and student preparedness.This study uses a quantitative method of correlation with a questionnaire based filed survey.Data were processed using SPSS 21 In order to achieve the study objectives 120 students were intensively interviewed in two senior high schools, namely Senior High School 1 Pakem and Senior High School 1 Cangkringan, which are located in close proximity to Merapi Volcano Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta Province.The results showed that as many as 120 students, or 95% of the total research subjects, experienced a volcanic disaster.While the preparedness results obtained from the four main parameters, namely (1) Knowledge and attitudes, (2) Emergency response plans, (3) Disaster warning systems (4) Resource Mobilization, showed that 120 students were in the "Ready" category.The results of this study indicate a mismatch between aspects of knowledge and preparedness.The lack of transfer of disaster knowledge to students influences common disaster knowledge.It was found that, high preparedness has direct relationship with students' experiences, as they were directly affected by Merapi Volcanic disasters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".