Individualized Goal Setting for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-Based Rehabilitation Using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a client-centered outcome measure that facilitates the prioritization of individualized interventions. Given the rising emphasis on individualized intervention in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), this cross-sectional study aimed to explore caregivers' perspectives on their children's functional goals within PICUs. From 1 September 2020 to 26 June 2022, caregivers of 41 children aged 1-18 years completed the COPM within 48 h of PICU admission. The study also explored the clinical variables predicting a high number of occupational performance goals (≥4/5). Out of 190 goals proposed by caregivers, 87 (45.8%) pertained to occupational performance, while 103 (54.2%) were related to personal factors. Among the occupational performance goals, the majority were associated with functional mobility (55; 28.9%), followed by personal care (29; 15.2%) and quiet recreation (3; 1.6%). Among personal goals, physiological factors (68; 35.8%) were most common, followed by physical factors (35; 18.4%). We found caregiver anxiety, measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State, to be a significant predictor of the number of occupational performance goals. These findings underscore the importance of caregiver psychological assessment in the PICU to facilitate personalized goal setting and improve rehabilitation outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".