The Project-based Learning using Design Thinking Model via Metaverse to Enhance Buddhism Innovators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The project-based learning using design thinking model via metaverse to enhance Buddhism innovators is integrating project-based and design thinking processes. Besides, using technology in the virtual world promotes learning activities. The model focused on allowing learners to study independently with instructors as counselors and facilitating learning to encourage learners to Buddhism innovators, to spread Buddhism by organizing learning activities in a virtual environment. This research aims to create and study the results of developing project-based learning model using design thinking via metaverse to enhance Buddhism innovators. The samples were five experts in developing the model from various institutions in higher education, selected by purposive sampling. The results showed that 1) the project-based learning model using design thinking consists of preparation, define topics, create and test, present and evaluate, and 2) evaluating the appropriateness of the proposed model. It was found that (2.1) Project-based learning models using design thinking via metaverse (Integrated elements) are appropriate at the level of highest, (2.2) The project-based learning model using design thinking via metaverse (Individual element) is appropriate at the highest level, (2.3) The learning process with a project-based learning model using design thinking via metaverse is appropriate at the highest level, and (2.4) A project-based learning model based on design thinking via metaverse (Implementation), is appropriate at the highest level. It found that a project-based learning model using design thinking via metaverse can be a guideline for learning to enhance Buddhism innovators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it