Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δ9-desaturase Ole1 forms a supercomplex with Slc1 and Dga1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biosynthesis of the various lipid species that compose cellular membranes and lipid droplets depends on the activity of multiple enzymes functioning in coordinated pathways. The flux of intermediates through lipid biosynthetic pathways is regulated to respond to nutritional and environmental demands placed on the cell necessitating that there be flexibility in pathway activity and organization. This flexibility can in part be achieved through the organization of enzymes into metabolon supercomplexes. However, the composition and organization of such supercomplexes remain unclear. Here, we identified protein-protein interactions between acyltransferases Sct1, Gpt2, Slc1, Dga1, and the Δ9 acyl-CoA desaturase Ole1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We further determined that a subset of these acyltransferases interact with each other independent of Ole1. We show that truncated versions of Dga1 lacking the carboxyl-terminal 20 amino acid residues are nonfunctional and unable to bind Ole1. Furthermore, charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis revealed that a cluster of charged residues near the carboxyl terminus was required for the interaction with Ole1. Mutation of these charged residues disrupted the interaction between Dga1 and Ole1 but allowed Dga1 to retain catalytic activity and to induce lipid droplet formation. These data support the formation of a complex of acyltransferases involved in lipid biosynthesis that interacts with Ole1, the sole acyl-CoA desaturase in S. cerevisiae, that can channel unsaturated acyl chains toward phospholipid or triacylglycerol synthesis. This desaturasome complex may provide the architecture that allows for the necessary flux of de novo-synthesized unsaturated acyl-CoA to phospholipid or triacylglycerol synthesis as demanded by cellular requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".