MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379057127 · doi:10.3390/molecules28114483

Quantitation of Tissue Amyloid via Fluorescence Spectroscopy Using Controlled Concentrations of Thioflavin-S

2023· article· en· W4379057127 on OpenAlexafffund
Tatiana P. MacKeigan, Megan L. Morgan, Peter K. Stys

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecules · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta InnovatesMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
KeywordsThioflavinFluorescenceChemistryAmyloid (mycology)Fluorescence spectroscopyBiophysicsSpectroscopyBiologyPathologyMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseOpticsPhysicsInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyloids are misfolded proteins that aggregate into fibrillar structures, the accumulation of which is associated with the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Early, sensitive detection of these misfolded aggregates is of great interest to the field, as amyloid deposition begins well before the presentation of clinical symptoms. Thioflavin-S (ThS) is a fluorescent probe commonly used to detect amyloid pathology. Protocols for ThS staining vary, but they often use high staining concentrations followed by differentiation, which causes varying levels of non-specific staining and potentially leaves more subtle amyloid deposition unidentified. In this study, we developed an optimized ThS staining protocol for the sensitive detection of β-amyloids in the widely used 5xFAD Alzheimer's mouse model. Controlled dye concentrations together with fluorescence spectroscopy and advanced analytical methods enabled not only the visualization of plaque pathology, but also the detection of subtle and widespread protein misfolding throughout the 5xFAD white matter and greater parenchyma. Together, these findings demonstrate the efficacy of a controlled ThS staining protocol and highlight the potential use of ThS for the detection of protein misfolding that precedes clinical manifestation of disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoleculesSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207