MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379114230 · doi:10.2118/215818-pa

Utilizing Remote Sensing and Data Analytics Techniques to Detect Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry and Assist with Sustainability Metrics

2023· article· en· W4379114230 on OpenAlexaff
Ángel E. Esparza, Michael Ebbs, Nina de Toro Eadie, Raphaëlle Roffo, L. Monnington

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Operations · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsGHGSat (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasSustainabilityAnalyticsFossil fuelCloud computingSupply chainComputer scienceBusinessEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringData scienceWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The purpose of this paper is to provide additional information and insights gained on manuscript SPE-209980-MS, accepted for presentation at the 2022 Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (Esparza et al. 2022). The energy sector has been identified as one of the main contributors to emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. Therefore, sustainability in the sector is mainly associated with the advancement in environmental and social performance across multiple industries. Individual firms, particularly those belonging to the oil and gas (O&G) industry, are now assessed for their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and their impact on climate change. To meet the different key performance indicators (KPIs) for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ESG, the planning, development, and operation of O&G infrastructure must be conducted in an environmentally responsible way. Today, operators calculate their own emissions, which are typically self-reported annually, usually relying on emission factors to complement the lack of emission measurement data. This paper discusses how methane detection of O&G infrastructure using remote sensing technologies enables operators to detect, quantify, and minimize methane emissions while gaining insights and understanding of their operations via data analytics products. The remote sensing technologies accounted for in this paper are satellite and aerial platforms operating in tandem with data analytics, providing a scheme to support sustainability initiatives through the quantification of some ESG metrics associated with methane emissions. This paper presents examples of measurements at O&G sites taken with satellites and aircraft platforms, providing evidence of methane emissions at the facility level. A discussion of each platform and how they work together is also presented. Additionally, this paper discusses how these data insights can be used to achieve sustainability goals, functioning as a tool for ESG initiatives through the incorporation of analytical models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Production & OperationsSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207