MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379115443 · doi:10.1246/bcsj.20230081

Muon Spin Rotation (μSR) for Characterizing Radical Addition to C=S in Xanthene-9-thione and Thioxanthene-9-thione

2023· article· en· W4379115443 on OpenAlexaff
Shigekazu Ito, Hikaru Akama, Kenji Kojima, Iain McKenzie, Kazuaki Kuwahata, Masanori Tachikawa

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of WaterlooTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuoniumChemistryMuonMuon spin spectroscopyXantheneHyperfine structureRadicalPhotochemistryAtomic physicsHydrogenNuclear physicsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Muonium (μ+e−) can be produced by capture of an electron by a spin-polarized muon (μ+) and has been utilized as a light isotope of hydrogen. In this paper, we demonstrate muon spin rotation (μSR) experiments and preliminary computational analyses of the regioselective muonium addition to xanthene-9-thione and thioxanthene-9-thione providing the C-centered radicals. The transverse-field muon spin rotation (TF-μSR) experiments of the cyclic thioketones revealed considerable increase of muon hyperfine coupling constants (muon hfc, Aμ) compared with the muoniated thiobenzophenone, indicating crucial roles of the bridging chalcogen atom promoting the overlap between the S–Mu bond orbital and the radical p orbital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Chemical Society of JapanSame topicMuon and positron interactions and applicationsFrench-language works237,207