MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379164614 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2023.14.0010

Comparison of Nutritional and Functional Components and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Different <i>Momordica charantia</i> Varieties

2023· article· en· W4379164614 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hongmei Zhang, Haijun Jin, Jizhu Yu, Jiawei Cui, Lizhong He, Xiaotao Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
KeywordsMomordicaTroloxABTSDPPHFood scienceChemistryAntioxidantPhenolsBotanyBiologyBiochemistryTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The differences of nutrient content, functional component content and total antioxidant capacity of 25 different varieties (lines) of Momordica charantia  were compared, and the correlation between functional components and the total antioxidant capacity of Momordica charantia  was analyzed, so as to provide the basis for the breeding of fresh and processed Momordica charantia  varieties and the development of functional food of Momordica charantia . The results showed that the contents of vitamin C, soluble protein, cellulose, amino acid and total acid in pulp of different varieties (lines) were significantly different, the average values were 85.71 μg/g, 7.98 mg/g, 319.04 mg/g, 1.45 mg/g, 0.41%, and the coefficient of variation were 28.47%, 29.07%, 11.05%, 43.45% and 12.20%, respectively. There were significant differences in the contents of total saponins, polysaccharides, flavonoids and total phenols in different varieties (lines), with the average values of 5.02 µg/g, 38.36 mg/g, 2.64 mg/g and 7.68 mg/g, respectively. The number of variation lines was 45.62%, 25.47%, 21.97% and 18.49%, respectively. The average antioxidant capacity of DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazy), ABTS +· (2,2’-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid diammonium salt) and FRAP (Ferric reducing/antioxidant power) were 1.73 μmol Trolox/g, 67.38 μmol Trolox/g and 11.62 μmol Trolox/g, respectively, and the variation coefficients were 19.65%, 17.25% and 31.50%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between total phenol content and total antioxidant capacity of Momordica charantia . Over all, there were significant genotypic differences in the contents of nutrients, functional components and antioxidant value in the pulp of 25 varieties (lines), and the total phenol content in the pulp was the main material basis for the antioxidant activity of  Momordica charantia . In the breeding and cultivation of new bitter gourd varieties, the corresponding varieties should be selected according to different uses, which is conducive to the development of the advantages and commercial value of the varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207