ALEXITHYMIA, LONELINESS AND INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS IN YOUNG ADULTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The study was to investigate the relationship among alexithymia, loneliness and interpersonal problems in young adults. It was hypothesized that alexithymia referring to difficulties in identifying and verbally describing feelings would predict loneliness and interpersonal problems.
 Materials and Methods: A sample of 240 students was taken from different government and private universities of Lahore city. Sample included both men (n = 120) and women (n = 120) with in the age range of 18 to 25 years (M=21.38, SD=1.88). Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), University of California-Los Angeles Loneliness Scale – Version 3 (UCLA) and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Circumplex (IIP-SC) was used to assess alexithymia loneliness and interpersonal problems respectively.
 Conclusion: The results indicated that there was a significant positive correlation among alexithymia, loneliness and interpersonal problems and alexithymia predicted loneliness and interpersonal problems. The results can be useful in designing interventional programs, strategies for treatment or counseling based on regulation of emotions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it