Deep learning from harmonized peptide libraries enables retention time prediction of diverse post translational modifications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In proteomics experiments, peptide retention time (RT) is an orthogonal property to fragmentation when assessing detection confidence. Advances in deep learning enable accurate RT prediction for any peptide from sequence alone, including those yet to be experimentally observed. Here we present Chronologer, an open-source software tool for rapid and accurate peptide RT prediction. Using new approaches to harmonize and false-discovery correct across independently collected datasets, Chronologer is built on a massive database with >2.2 million peptides including 10 common post-translational modification (PTM) types. By linking knowledge learned across diverse peptide chemistries, Chronologer predicts RTs with less than two-thirds the error of other deep learning tools. We show how RT for rare PTMs, such as OGlcNAc, can be learned with high accuracy using as few as 10-100 example peptides in newly harmonized datasets. This iteratively updatable workflow enables Chronologer to comprehensively predict RTs for PTM-marked peptides across entire proteomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".