MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379279824 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2023.196

P.103 Imaging neuron-glioma cell interactions in freely behaving animals with a novel implantable mini-microscope

2023· article· en· W4379279824 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael B. Keough, Kiarash Shamardani, Michelle Monje

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWorkers Compensation Board of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaNeuronCalcium imagingNeuroscienceIn vivoCellBiologyCalciumCell culturePathologyMedicineCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: High grade gliomas (HGG) are diffusely infiltrative brain tumours with dismal prognosis. Recent studies from our lab have demonstrated that glioma cells form synapses with surrounding neurons, and proliferate in response to neuronal input. How these neuron-glioma networks develop, and are influenced by experience, is currently unknown. We aimed to develop a novel imaging tool to study neuron-glioma cell interactions in freely behaving animals. Methods: Several patient-derived HGG cell lines were transfected to express the green calcium indicator GCaMP6s. These cells were xenografted into the premotor cortex of mice, along with a virus expressing the red calcium indicator jRGECO1a under a neuron-specific synapsin promotor to allow dual-color imaging of neurons and glioma cells. The Inscopix mini-microscope system was implanted into the cortex to allow real-time live calcium imaging in freely behaving animals. Results: Several HGG cell lines effectively expressed the GCaMP6s calcium indicator. In vivo, we were successfully able to image both neurons and glioma cells simultaneously in freely behaving mice in real time. Conclusions: The Inscopix system has been modified for studying cancer cells for the first time. This technology will be used to study how pharmacological agents and neuronal experience shape neuron-glioma circuit dynamics, to develop new therapeutic strategies for HGG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207