MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tumor volume and T2 hyperintensity changes from DeFi: A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of nirogacestat in patients with desmoid tumors.

2023· article· en· W4379280704 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Alcindor, Bernd Kasper, Mrinal M. Gounder, Ravin Ratan, Winette T.A. van der Graaf, Breelyn A. Wilky, Richard F. Riedel, Noah Federman, Agnese Peruzzi, Stephanie Moody, Allison Lim, Brad Tumminello, Shivaani Kummar, Patrick Schöffski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersSpringworks Therapeutics
KeywordsMedicineClinical endpointHyperintensityPlaceboMagnetic resonance imagingHazard ratioNuclear medicineSurrogate endpointInternal medicineRadiologyRandomized controlled trialPathologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

11514 Background: MRI tumor volume or T2 signal intensity changes may represent novel imaging techniques that could have a prognostic or predictive value for assessing response in desmoid tumors (DT). For example, hyperintense areas on T2-weighted images have been associated with active fibroblastic proliferation and ≥90% hyperintensity is associated with DT disease progression, whereas iso- or hypo-intense areas are associated with inactive sites of disease. In DeFi (NCT03785964), the novel gamma secretase inhibitor nirogacestat (n=70 patients) significantly improved the primary endpoint of PFS compared with placebo (n=72 patients; hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.15, 0.55; P<0.001]) and significantly improved the secondary endpoint of ORR per blinded, independent central review (41% vs 8%; P<0.001). Complete responses were achieved in 7% with nirogacestat and 0% with placebo. Here, we present an exploratory analysis of MRI tumor volume and T2 signal intensity changes in DeFi. Methods: Eligible adults had histologically confirmed DT that had progressed ≥20% per RECIST v1.1 within 12 months of screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nirogacestat 150 mg or placebo twice daily taken continuously in 28-day cycles. Volumetric MRI and T2 hyperintensity of the largest target tumor were evaluated at screening and every 6 cycles during the double-blind phase. MRI T2 signal intensity is represented as the ratio of hyperintensity in total tumor volume to muscle background. A blinded, independent, central radiologist reviewed all MRI scans. Results: Nirogacestat treatment led to more substantial reductions versus placebo in tumor volume and T2 hyperintensity ratio (Table). At baseline, similar proportions of patients in each arm had a T2 hyperintensity ratio ≥90% (95% vs 97%). This ratio changed from ≥90% at baseline to <90% at any time after baseline in 34% of patients in the nirogacestat arm and 15% of those on placebo. Conclusions: In DeFi, nirogacestat demonstrated substantial reduction of tumor volume and T2 hyperintensity of the largest target tumors by MRI compared with placebo in adults with DT. These results are consistent with the significant improvement in ORR achieved with nirogacestat. These data suggest that volumetric MRI and T2 hyperintensity might provide additional information in the evaluation of treatment response in DT. The prognostic or predictive value of these imaging techniques in DT should be further studied. Clinical trial information: NCT03785964 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207