MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) and outcomes in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PC) following radical prostatectomy (RP).

2023· article· en· W4379281728 on OpenAlexaff
Nasreen Khan, Rana R. McKay, Daniel E. Spratt, Niculae Constantinovici, Guifang Chen, Jorge Ortíz, Shankar Srinivasan, Zdravko P. Vassilev, Julie Xu, Neal D. Shore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
FundersBayer
KeywordsMedicineBiochemical recurrenceProstate cancerProstatectomyInternal medicinebreakpoint cluster regionUrologyOncologyHazard ratioCohortMetastasisCancerSurgeryConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17112 Background: RP is often the primary treatment option for pts with clinically localized PC. Despite its frequent success, more than 30% of pts eventually present with BCR, defined as detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP. BCR is associated with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis and ultimately death. Current patterns of BCR and the impact of BCR on treatment choice and clinical outcomes are not well characterized. Methods: This retrospective cohort study uses nationally representative Optum© Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data from 1/2010 to 9/2021. Eligible pts were adults who underwent RP after PC diagnosis, had ≥ 3 available PSA values after RP, and had EMR activity for at least 6 mo before and 12 mo after RP. Pts with prior malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancers and pts with metastatic PC at baseline (BL) or within 3 months after RP were excluded. The BL period was 6 mo before RP. Primary outcome was frequency of BCR (defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL); secondary analyses included % of pts who progressed to metastasis, castration-resistant PC (CRPC), and death after BCR, and factors associated with time to BCR. Results: 15,198 pts who underwent RP were included in this analysis. Key pt characteristics/outcomes are shown in the Table. Median (range) age was 63.0 (36-88) y, 85.9% of pts were White, and 10.0% were African American. Median (Q1-Q3) follow-up was 3.9 (2.4-5.7) y, and 14.3% of pts had subsequent adjuvant/salvage radiation therapy (RT). Overall, 19.8% of all pts and 61.4% of the subgroup of 2,178 pts with subsequent RT developed BCR. Among pts with BCR (n = 3,016), 16.3% had a PSA doubling time ≤ 10 mo, 17.1% developed metastasis, 13.8% developed CRPC, and 9.7% died. In multivariate Cox regression models (Table), the BL factors associated with an increased risk of developing BCR were PSA 10- < 20 or ≥ 20 ng/mL, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) > 0, age ≥ 65, African American race, public insurance, and living in the US South region. Conclusions: This real-world (RW) study evaluates the occurrence of BCR in pts who underwent RP with a curative intent from a large US database. This study confirms BL PSA as an important prognostic marker for BCR. A considerable % of pts with BCR developed metastatic PC (17%) or died (10%) during the study period. Novel treatment strategies are needed to delay BCR and further progression to advanced PC among pts with high-risk localized disease. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→