MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A first-in-human, open-label, phase I trial of daily oral PCLX-001, an NMT inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and advanced solid tumors.

2023· article· en· W4379282095 on OpenAlexaff
Randeep Sangha, Rahima Jamal, Jennifer L. Spratlin, John Kuruvilla, Laurie H. Sehn, Michael J. Weickert, Luc G. Berthiaume, John R. Mackey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity Health NetworkCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaPharmacologyCancerLymphomaPharmacokineticsRefractory (planetary science)ToxicityInternal medicineCancer researchOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15094 Background: Myristoylation, the N-terminal modification of proteins with the fatty acid myristate, regulates multiple membrane-bound signal transduction pathways driving cancer cell biology. This modification is catalyzed by two N-myristoyltransferases (NMT), NMT1 and NMT2. Aberrant NMT expression has been identified in cancer cells and inhibition of myristoylation represents a novel anticancer treatment strategy. PCLX-001 is an oral, highly bioavailable, small molecule NMT inhibitor with strong affinity for both NMT1 and NMT2 proteins (IC50 of 5nM and 8nM, respectively). In vitro, hematologic cancer cell lines were exquisitely sensitive to PCLX-001. PCLX-001 regressed subcutaneous tumors in xenograft models derived from lymphoma cell lines, as well as in a refractory DLBCL patient derived xenograft model. PCLX-001 also demonstrated anticancer activity in multiple solid tumor xenograft models. Based on pre-clinical data, we hypothesized that PCLX-001 would be safe, tolerable, and active as a novel oral cancer therapeutic. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and advanced solid tumors are being enrolled in a multicenter, open label, standard phase I dose escalation design to determine feasibility, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of PCLX-001 monotherapy. Seven dose levels are being studied: 20 mg, 40 mg, 70 mg, 100 mg, 140 mg, 200 mg, and 280 mg. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as: grade (Gr) 4 platelets, Gr 3 platelets with bleeding, Gr 4 ANC ≥ 7 days, febrile neutropenia, or clinically significant > Gr 3 non-hematologic toxicity. Results: Eighteen evaluable patients (3 relapsed B-cell lymphoma; 15 advanced solid tumor) have been accrued through dose level six (200 mg cohort) without DLT. No attributable Gr 3 or 4 toxicities have been identified. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses demonstrate rapid oral absorption, a terminal half-life of approximately 10 hours, rapid achievement of steady state, and no induction of metabolism. PCLX-001 trough plasma concentrations at higher dose cohorts exceed the EC90 required to inhibit cultured cancer cells. Conclusions: PCLX-001 is safe and well tolerated up to the 200 mg daily dose. Our results support the ongoing development of PCLX-001 as an oral daily therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Updated study results will be presented, summarizing the safety, MTD, and PK outcomes in PCLX-001 treated patients. Preliminary clinical activity will be determined in 20 patient dose expansion cohorts of relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas, and selected advanced solid tumors following the identification of PCLX-001 MTD. Clinical trial information: NCT04836195 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis→French-language works237,207→