MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in somatostatin receptor subtype 2–expressing (SSTR2+) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after <sup>177</sup>Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Initial safety analysis.

2023· article· en· W4379282289 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Morris, Gary A. Ulaner, Daniel M. Halperin, Jonathan Strosberg, Samuel H. Mehr, Daneng Li, Heloisa P. Soares, Lowell Anthony, Sandy Kotiah, Heather A. Jacene, Marianne Pavel, Pamela L. Kunz, Denis Vasconcelos Ferreira, Joanne Li, Kimberly Ma, Jessica Rearden, Susan Moran, Thomas A. Hope, Simron Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuroendocrine tumorsNuclear medicineAdverse effectInternal medicineSomatostatin receptor 2Somatostatin receptorSomatostatinRadionuclide therapyToxicityPharmacokineticsGastroenterologyOncologyPharmacologyUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4132 Background: RYZ101 ( 225 Ac-DOTATATE) is a first-in-class, highly potent alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical in development for treating SSTR2+ solid tumors. Alpha-particles (as emitted by 225 Ac) have a shorter path length (40–100 μm) and higher linear energy transfer (80–100 keV/μm) than beta-particles, causing more frequent double-strand DNA breaks and potentially higher cancer cell kill rates and less damage to healthy tissues. ACTION-1 (NCT05477576) is a 2-part, global, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 1b/3 trial of RYZ101 in patients (pts) with advanced well-differentiated SSTR+ GEP-NETs progressing after 177 Lu-SSA therapy. Part 1 (phase 1b) aims to determine safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D) of RYZ101. Methods: Part 1 is an uncontrolled dose de-escalation study with a Bayesian optimal interval design. Escalation (0.197) and de-escalation (0.298) boundaries based on a target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25% were applied. Pts received RYZ101 IV every 8w for up to 4 cycles. Planned dose levels (n=6/level): Level 0 (starting dose), 120 kBq/kg (3.2 µCi/kg); if necessary, Level –1, 90 kBq/kg (2.4 µCi/kg); Level –2, 60 kBq/kg (1.6 µCi/kg). No dose escalation above starting dose was permitted. DLT was assessed for 56d after the first RYZ101 treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Dose de-escalation decisions and safety data review were overseen by a Data Review Committee. Data cut-off: 26 Oct 2022. Results: At data cut-off, 9 pts had received RYZ101 at 120 kBq/kg (median dose 8.9 MBq); 7 pts were DLT-evaluable. No DLTs occurred and no dose de-escalation steps were implemented. Baseline characteristics: median age 70y; male (n=6)/female (n=3); ECOG PS 0 (n=4)/1 (n=5); median disease duration 6.9y; primary tumor site GI (n=6)/pancreas (n=3). A safety summary is shown. No treatment-related serious AEs were observed. TEAE requiring dose reductions occurred in 2 pts (Grade 2 platelet count decreased, n=1; Grade 2 thrombocytopenia, n=1). Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs occurred in 3 pts (lymphocyte count decreased, n=2; skin infection, n=1; weight decreased, n=1). One serious adverse event (skin infection) was unrelated to treatment. Conclusions: RYZ101 was well tolerated at 120 kBq/kg, which was declared the RP3D. Part 2 (Phase 3) will commence after Part 1 and will compare RYZ101 at the RP3D with standard of care in pts with advanced SSTR2+ GEP-NETs with disease progression following prior 177 Lu-labeled SSAs. Clinical trial information: NCT05477576 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207