MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-world safety and effectiveness of MVASI in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Canada.

2023· article· en· W4379282976 on OpenAlexaffabout
Winson Y. Cheung, Setareh Samimi, Kim Ma, Gregory Knight, Shaqil Kassam, Bruce Colwell, Annie Beaudoin, Mark Vincent, Mateya Trinkaus, Alain Filion, Hatim Karachiwala, Timothy R. Asmis, Lucas Sidéris, Leyla Nunez, Rajvi J. Wani, Carlye Cirone Morris, Elaine Ngan, Yinhao Du

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreMarkham Stouffville HospitalSouthlake Regional Health CenterCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalVictoria HospitalOttawa HospitalCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesNova Scotia Health AuthorityCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesLondon Health Sciences CentreAmgen (Canada)Grand River Hospital
FundersAmgen
KeywordsMedicineBevacizumabColorectal cancerInternal medicineBiosimilarAdverse effectOncologyMedical recordCancerSurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15555 Background: MVASI is a biosimilar to the reference product, bevacizumab, and is the first biosimilar approved by Health Canada for the first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study addresses the limited real-world evidence by describing the safety and effectiveness of MVASI as 1L therapy in mCRC. Methods: Retrospective data were collected in two waves of sites across Canada, at least 1 year (wave 1) or 2 years (wave 2) after commercial availability of MVASI at each site. Adult patients treated with ≥ 1 MVASI cycles as their 1L therapy for mCRC were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected 6 months prior to MVASI initiation (index date). Medical history, adjuvant treatment, and CRC diagnosis were collected within 5 years of pre-index date. Outcomes were gathered between index and chart review dates. Results: Among the 75 patients in wave 1, 36 (48.0%) were male and the median age was 62 years. Of the 164 patients in wave 2, 98 (59.8%) were male and the median age was 67 years. Most patients in wave 1 (42/69; 60.9%) and wave 2 (87/141; 61.7%) had a RAS mutation. The median time from mCRC diagnosis to MVASI initiation among wave 1 and 2 patients was 3.1 (IQR [2.1, 4.2]) and 2.3 months (IQR [1.6, 3.7]), respectively. At least one safety event of interest (EOI) was recorded for 26/75 (34.7%) wave 1 and 70/164 (42.7%) wave 2 patients (Table 1). The median progression free survival (PFS) for wave 1 and 2 patients were 9.47 and 21.38 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for wave 1 patients was not estimable and was 26.45 months for wave 2 patients. Conclusions: In this real-world study, mCRC patients treated with 1L MVASI were generally representative of the Canadian mCRC population treated with 1L bevacizumab. Compared with clinical trials of MVASI and reference bevacizumab, the EOI profile and the OS data are similar, but lower rates of individual EOIs are observed in this real-world setting. The shorter PFS observed in wave 1 may be due to higher rates of comorbidities at baseline and longer time from mCRC diagnosis to index. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207