MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARP) in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2023· review· en· W4379283170 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Stecca, Maysa Vilbert, Isabella Michelon, Caio Castro, Maria Inez Dacoregio, Fábio Roberto Fin, Audrey Tieko Tsunoda, Andréia Cristina de Melo, Alexandre André Balieiro Anastácio da Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioPopulationOncologyPARP inhibitorCancerOvarian cancerMeta-analysisConfidence intervalPoly ADP ribose polymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17587 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients with or without homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In this meta-analysis, the latest clinical data to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach across different subgroups were synthesized. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared maintenance PARPi with placebo in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) according to HRD status, overall survival (OS), second PFS (PFS2), and time-to-first subsequent treatment (TFST). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. A random-effects model was used for outcomes with high heterogeneity. Results: A total of 6 Randomized clinical trials with 3609 patients were included, of whom 2348 (65%) received maintenance PARPi. PFS was significantly longer for HRD-positive patients receiving PARPi [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.37 – 0.52 p<0.001] and for HRD-negative patients [HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.92 p=0.009]. Maintenance PARPi was associated with improved OS in HRD-positive patients [HR 0.59, CI 0.47 -0.73, p<0.001] but not in unselected patients. PFS2 in the HRD-positive population was reported in three trials, and it favored the use of PARPi [HR 0.57, CI 0.43 – 0.76, p<0.001]. Adverse events ≥grade 3 were more common in patients on maintenance PARPi (p<0.001). The occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome was numerically but not significantly higher in the PARPi group. Conclusions: Maintenance with PARPi in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer significantly prolongs PFS regardless of HRD status. Moreover, PARPi maintenance improves OS and PFS2 in patients with BRCA and/or HRD-positive tumors compared to placebo. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.034
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.223
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207