MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The initial report of phase I trial of VG2025, a non-attenuated HSV-1 oncolytic virus expressing IL-12 and IL-15/RA payloads, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2023· article· en· W4379283180 on OpenAlexaff
Siqing Fu, Madappa N. Kundranda, Shah Rahimian, Yinan Shen, David S.P. Tan, Ronghua Zhao, Naghmeh Esmaeili, Manu Pratap Singh, Jun Ding, Yanal Murad, Tingbo Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncolytic virusPharmacokineticsInternal medicineGastroenterologyColorectal cancerPharmacodynamicsCarcinoembryonic antigenCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2580 Background: VG2025 is a non-attenuated HSV-1 Oncolytic virus (OV). The wildtype neurovirulence is controlled by the Transcription and Translation Dual Regulation (TTDR) of ICP27 and ICP34.5 proteins. IL-12, IL-15, IL-15Ra payloads are controlled by tumor promoter CxCR4. The native promoter of ICP27 was replaced with a promoter for Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA). Here we report a first-in-human, open label, study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and biologic effects of VG2025 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors progressed after standard of care from China and United States. The study is actively recruiting. NCT05266612. Methods: Dose escalation follows a 3+3 design at 4 dose levels as intratumoral, and image guided injections into deep lesions on days 1 and 15 of each 28 days treatment cycle. PK and viral shedding (DNA), samples from biopsies, blood, urine, and swabs from injection site and other anatomical locations were analyzed by PCR. Changes of cytokines and lymphocyte subsets in blood were also observed as pharmacodynamic parameters. Results: As of 10 Jan 2023, 10 pts received doses of 1.0x10^8 and 2.0x10^8 PFU. 5 males and 5 females with the median age of 58 years were enrolled. 20% were PD(L)1 refractory, 20% had 2 Prior lines of therapy and 60% ≥3. The Median CEA level was 7.4. Tumor types were: 2 Duodenal Adeno Ca., 1 Pancreatic, 1 Ovarian, 1 Leiomyosarcoma, 1 Salivary Duct Ca., 1 Hepatocellular Ca (HCC), 1 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 1 Colorectal Ca (CRC) and 1 Colon Ca. No Dose Limiting Toxicities were observed. Any grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) was 70%, the most common TRAEs was fever 60%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were 50% [3 pts had grade 4 Lymphocyte decreased (all recovered)], 1 had grade 3 COVID-19 and 1 had grade 3 nausea and vomiting. 4 pt had SAEs (2 cases of COVID-19, 1 Ascites and 1 Nausea and Vomiting). No TRAEs leading to dose reduction and treatment discontinuation. No pts had positive viral shedding. 4 pts were efficacy evaluable; ORR 25% (1 pt with ICC had confirmed PR with -45%) and DCR 100% based on RECIST v1.1. The PR pt had meaningful reductions in CEA levels. Tumor shrinkage was also observed in non-injected lesions demonstrating an abscopal effect. Nanostring analysis of paired biopsies from the PR pt demonstrate upregulation of genes for integrin signaling pathway, activation of CD8+ T cells and T cell-based immunity, upregulation of antigen-presenting MHC (HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DRB1) and chemokine receptor (CMKLR1) genes. Cellular immunity was activated by upregulation of Th1 cells, macrophage-associated genes and downregulation of Treg-associated genes. The results are consistent with the mechanism of action of VG2025. Analysis is ongoing with other subjects. Conclusions: Monotherapy activity was observed with an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated pts with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05266612 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→