Update for NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH: Active trial cohorts for children, adolescents and young adults with refractory cancers.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS10071 Background: The National Cancer Institute–Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy choice (MATCH) trial seeks to facilitate evaluation of molecular-targeted therapies in biomarker-selected cohorts of childhood and young adult patients with cancer by screening tumors for actionable alterations. The Pediatric MATCH screening protocol and first seven treatment arms were activated in July 2017 for patients treated at COG sites across the United States; six additional treatment arms were activated between 2017 and 2020. In 2022 a major screening protocol amendment discontinued centralized tumor testing at MATCH laboratories and mandated use of molecular profiling reports from outside laboratories to determine treatment arm eligibility. Methods: The trial assigns patients aged 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on the genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Starting in January 2022, a clinical tumor molecular profiling report from a CAP/CLIA-approved laboratory has been required for patients to enroll in the screening protocol. The treating site indicates which molecular alteration in the submitted report is believed to be actionable as well as the open Pediatric MATCH study arm for which the patient is proposed to be eligible. The submitted report is then reviewed by the study Molecular Review Committee to determine if an actionable alteration is present (based upon study-defined levels of preclinical and clinical evidence): if so, the patient is assigned to the relevant MATCH treatment arm. Other treatment arm eligibility requirements are typical of phase 2 pediatric trials including adequate patient performance status and standard washout periods for prior therapy. Each treatment arm follows a one (arms A, D, F, M, N) or two (arm K) stage design with a 20 patient primary cohort and option for histology-specific expansion cohort(s) if at least 3 objective responses are seen in a tumor histology. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints include safety/tolerability and progression-free survival. Therapy is discontinued if there is evidence of progressive disease or drug related dose-limiting toxicity that requires removal from therapy; therapy may otherwise continue for up to 2 years. As of January 2023, 6 of the 13 Pediatric MATCH treatment arms remain open to enrollment (Table). Clinical trial information: NCT03155620 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".