Phase 3 trial of subcutaneous epcoritamab + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): EPCORE DLBCL-2.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS7592 Background: In pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL, standard treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 67.0%, 58.4%, and 45.8% for International Prognostic Index (IPI) 2, 3, and 4–5, respectively (Ruppert et al, Blood 2020). Epcoritamab is a subcutaneously administered, bispecific antibody that binds CD3 on T cells and CD20 on B cells, inducing potent and selective T-cell–mediated killing of malignant CD20+ B cells (Hutchings et al, Lancet 2021). Epcoritamab monotherapy demonstrated deep and durable responses (overall response rate [ORR], 63%; complete response rate, 39%) and was generally well tolerated in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive, large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) (Thieblemont et al, J Clin Oncol 2022). Results from an ongoing phase 1/2 study in high-risk pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL (EPCORE NHL-2 arm 1; NCT04663347) show that epcoritamab + R-CHOP has promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in high-risk pts with IPI 3–5. Among efficacy-evaluable pts (n = 31), ORR was 100% and complete metabolic response (CMR) was 77%; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events (n = 17/33; 52%) were mostly low-grade, had predictable timing, and did not lead to treatment discontinuation (Falchi et al, ASCO 2022, abstract 7523). These encouraging data support further evaluation of epcoritamab + R-CHOP for the treatment of newly diagnosed DLBCL. Methods: This phase 3, global, multicenter, open-label study (NCT05578976) evaluates the efficacy and safety of epcoritamab + R-CHOP in adults newly diagnosed with one of the following CD20+ DLBCL (de novo or transformed from follicular lymphoma [FL]): 1) DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS); 2) high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL-2 and/or BCL-6 rearrangement; 3) T-cell/histiocyte–rich LBCL; 4) Epstein-Barr virus–positive DLBCL, NOS; or 5) FL grade 3b. Other key eligibility criteria include IPI ≥2 (pts with IPI 2 not to exceed ~30% of total pts), ECOG PS 0–2, and ≥1 measurable disease site. Approximately 900 pts will be randomized 2:1 to either epcoritamab + R-CHOP (6 cycles, followed by 2 cycles of epcoritamab) or R-CHOP (6 cycles, followed by 2 cycles of rituximab). The primary efficacy endpoint is PFS in pts with IPI 3–5 (based on IRC assessment per Lugano criteria). The secondary efficacy endpoints are PFS in pts with IPI 2–5, event-free survival, CMR, overall survival, and minimal residual disease negativity. Safety endpoints include incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of special interest (CRS, immune cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and clinical tumor lysis syndrome. Enrollment began in January 2023 globally. Clinical trial information: NCT04663347 , NCT05578976 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".