MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Temporal patterns of immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) with tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in the phase 3 HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

2023· article· en· W4379332762 on OpenAlexaff
George Lau, Bruno Sangro, Oxana Crysler, Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen, Oleg Lipatov, Manabu Morimoto, Isabelle Archambeaud, Valentina Burgio, Le Thi Tuyet Phuong, Yee Chao, Jean‐Marie Péron, Marie‐Luise Berres, Yoo‐Joung Ko, Carrie L. McCoy, Charu Gupta, Mallory Makowsky, Alejandra Negro, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSTRIDERegimenAdverse effectInternal medicineOncologySurgeryGastroenterologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4073 Background: In the Phase 3 HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in uHCC, STRIDE (Single T Regular Interval D) significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib (S) and had manageable safety (Abou-Alfa et al. NEJM Evid 2022). STRIDE is approved for uHCC in the United States and Japan and is recommended for approval by the European Medicines Agency. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, we assessed temporal patterns of imAEs for the STRIDE regimen in HIMALAYA. Methods: Safety was assessed in participants (pts) who received ≥1 dose of STRIDE (T 300 mg [one dose] plus D 1500 mg once every 4 weeks) or S (400 mg twice daily). Treatment causality was investigator-assessed. imAEs were defined as AEs of special interest associated with drug exposure and consistent with an immune-mediated mechanism of action for which no alternate etiology was clear. Safety was summarized descriptively overall and at specific time points after the start of treatment. Results: In total, 388 (STRIDE) and 374 (S) pts were included in the safety analysis. Median (range) duration of exposure was 5.5 (0.4–41.9) months for STRIDE (D exposure in STRIDE) and 4.1 (0.1–38.6) months for S. Any grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were less frequent for STRIDE (75.8% and 25.8%, respectively) versus S (84.8% and 36.9%, respectively). Any grade imAEs and max Grade 3 or 4 imAEs occurred in 35.8% and 12.6% of pts, respectively for STRIDE. Any grade imAEs and max Grade 3 or 4 imAEs with STRIDE occurred at all time points assessed and were most likely to occur within the first three months after treatment. For STRIDE, any grade imAEs of gastrointestinal disorders and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders were most common within the first month after treatment (3.9% and 3.1%, respectively), whereas any grade imAEs of endocrine disorders were most common between >1 and ≤2 months (6.7%). Conclusions: In HIMALAYA, AEs with STRIDE were manageable and generally low grade. Any grade TRAEs and Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were less frequent for STRIDE versus S. Although imAEs with STRIDE could occur at any time, most were observed within the first three months after treatment. These findings continue to support STRIDE for the treatment of uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03298451 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→